Juvenile court costs.
Summary
Existing law provides for the appointment of counsel to represent a minor in juvenile court proceedings, as specified. The father, mother, spouse, or other person liable for the support of the minor is liable to the county for those costs, except as specified. Existing law authorizes the court, with the consent of the county and pursuant to the terms and conditions agreed upon by the court and the county, to designate a financial evaluation officer to make financial evaluations of liability for reimbursement pursuant to the provision governing liability for the cost to the county or the court of legal services rendered to a minor. This bill would additionally authorize the court to designate a court financial evaluation officer to make evaluations of liability for reimbursement for the costs of legal services rendered to a minor. The bill would also require both the court financial evaluation officer and the county financial evaluation officer to follow the procedures set forth for county financial evaluation officers, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Jan 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 18, 2010 · Assembly Aug 19, 2010
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 18, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 19, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6378.)
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-11-4)
senate
Aug 18, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 10, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 10).
upper
Feb 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (January 21).
lower
Jan 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (January 12).
lower
Jan 7, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (January 7).
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 31, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and L. GOV.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1229
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1229. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline