AB 1199 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Infrastructure financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

Summary
Existing law specifically authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from infrastructure financing districts. This bill would recast these provisions authorizing the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts that include specified waterfront property. This bill would also modify the procedures for San Francisco to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and allocate projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to specified annual apportionments. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for City and County of San Francisco.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
Jan 2010
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Signed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2010 · Assembly Jan 27, 2010

How they voted

290
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 38
Aug 25, 2010
D Democratic25
20 Yea 5
80% Yea
R Republican13
9 Yea 4
69% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
14
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-9)
senate
Aug 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Apr 7, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 7).
upper
Feb 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR.
upper
Jan 27, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-2-5)
assembly
Jan 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 21).
lower
Jan 21, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (January 13).
lower
Jan 7, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.). (1/7/2010)
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
CA
17