Elderly care: continuing care contracts: financial reporting requirements.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services and sets forth its various powers and duties, including, but not limited to, its licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including, but not limited to, residential care facilities for the elderly. Existing law provides for the regulation by the department of continuing care contracts and providers of continuing care and requires providers to submit an annual report of their financial condition. Existing law requires the report to include, among other things, a disclosure of funds accumulated for identified projects or purposes, and any funds maintained or designated for specific contingencies. Violation of certain of these provisions is a crime. This bill would require that the report also disclose funds that are expended for identified projects or purposes. The bill would also specify that the disclosure requirement includes, but is not limited to, projects designated to meet the needs of the continuing care retirement community as permitted by a provider's nonprofit status. This bill would require a disclosure made by a nonprofit provider to state how the project or purpose is consistent with the provider's tax-exempt status. The bill would also require a disclosure made by a for-profit provider to identify amounts accumulated for specific projects or purposes and amounts maintained for contingencies. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Jul 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jul 16, 2009 · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
Jul 16, 2009
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican14
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
8
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2655.)
lower
Jul 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-5)
senate
Jul 16, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-26-1)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
IR
Ira Ruskin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1169
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline