Contracts: translation.
Summary
Existing law requires a person in a trade or business who negotiates specified contracts or agreements primarily in the languages of Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, or Korean to deliver to the other party, prior to execution of the contract or agreement, a translation of the contract or agreement in the applicable foreign language, except as specified. Under existing law, failure to comply with these provisions entitles the aggrieved party to rescind the contract or agreement. Under existing law, these provisions apply to specified loans or extensions of credit subject to the Industrial Loan Law and the California Finance Lenders Law. This bill would, in the alternative, require a supervised financial organization, as defined, that negotiates primarily in one of those languages in the course of entering into a contract or agreement for a loan or extension of credit secured by residential real property, to deliver, prior to the execution of the contract or agreement, and no later than 3 business days after receiving the written application, a specified form in that language summarizing the terms of the contract or agreement, as specified. The bill would provide that a supervised financial organization that complies with these provisions would be deemed to be in compliance with the translation requirement in existing law described above. The bill would also provide that a supervised financial organization that complies with the translation requirement in existing law would be in compliance with these provisions. The bill would provide for administrative penalties against specified licensed persons for violations of these provisions. The bill would require the Department of Corporations and the Department of Financial Institutions to create a new form for these purposes, as provided, and to make it available in each of the languages described above. The bill would authorize an action against a supervised financial organization for a violation of these provisions to be brought only by a licensing agency or by the Attorney General. These provisions would become operative beginning on July 1, 2010, or 90 days after issuance of a form as provided, whichever occurs later. The provisions of this bill would not affect the obligations of a real estate broker, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly Jun 18, 2009
How they voted
24–12
Passed
Total votes 36
Sep 8, 2009
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
14
Committee
12
Amendments
11
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 3276.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-12)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (July 9).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-17-8)
assembly
Jun 11, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jun 8, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (June 8).
lower
Jun 2, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 20).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1160
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1160. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline