Juvenile court law: purpose.
Summary
Existing law sets forth the purpose of juvenile court law, and provides that a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court who is in need of protective services shall receive care, treatment, and guidance consistent with his or her best interest and the best interest of the public. Existing law provides that a minor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as a consequence of delinquent conduct shall, in conformity with the interests of public safety and protection, receive care, treatment, and guidance that is consistent with his or her best interest, that holds the minor accountable for his or her behavior, and that is appropriate for his or her circumstances. This bill would authorize a county to adopt a restorative justice program to address the needs of minors, victims, and the community. The bill would require the restorative justice program to be implemented through a restorative justice protocol developed by the juvenile court in conjunction with the prosecutor, public defender, and other interested groups. The bill would prohibit the use of General Fund moneys to fund the program. The bill would include related findings and declarations.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Jan 13, 2009
Vetoed Sep 25, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2010 · Assembly May 26, 2009
How they voted
24–8
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 24, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 25, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 25, 2010
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 6647.)
lower
Aug 24, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-8-3)
senate
Aug 24, 2010
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jul 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 26, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-13-5)
assembly
Apr 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 1).
lower
Mar 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 13.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 114
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 114. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline