Elections: ranked voting.
Summary
Existing law provides procedures for the nomination of candidates for elective offices in general law cities. It specifies the procedures for the conduct of the election, the canvass of ballots, and certification of persons elected to office. Related provisions require the holding of a runoff election if no candidate has been elected at the municipal election. Existing law provides that a vacancy in an elective office may be filled by appointment at a special election or at the next regular municipal election. Under existing law, the Secretary of State is the chief elections officer of the state and is required to administer the provisions of the Elections Code. This bill would authorize the Secretary of State to approve not more than 12 cities or counties, in total, to conduct a local election using ranked voting if specified conditions are met. The bill would specify requirements for using ranked voting in both a single-candidate election and a multiple-candidate election. The bill would require local elections officials to make certain reports relating to ranked voting elections and would also require those cities and counties to report on the success of conducting those elections to the Legislative Analyst, who would be required to report to the Legislature and make recommendations on the ranked voting elections. The bill would end the authority of cities and counties to adopt ranked voting on January 1, 2019, unless a later statute enacted prior to January 1, 2019, deletes or extends that date, but would allow such elections to be conducted until January 1, 2024.
Bill status
passed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Last action Sep 10, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
7
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-3)
senate
Aug 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Aug 24, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 7).
upper
Jul 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (33-24-5)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (May 28).
lower
May 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 21).
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1121
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1121. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline