Advanced electrical distributed generation technology.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The existing definition of an electrical corporation excludes a corporation or person employing cogeneration, as defined, technology or producing electricity from other than a conventional power source for certain purposes. Existing law states that it is the policy of the state to encourage and support the development of cogeneration as an efficient, environmentally beneficial, competitive energy resource that will enhance the reliability of local generation supply, and promote local business growth. Existing law places certain limitations upon gas rates and surcharges charged cogenerators. Existing law prohibits placing alternative fuel capability requirements upon gas customers that use gas for purposes of cogeneration. This bill would authorize the commission and the State Air Resources Board to treat advanced electrical distributed generation technology, as defined, as cogeneration, and would make certain existing limitations upon gas rates and surcharges charged cogenerators applicable to an advanced electrical distributed generation technology. The bill would make the prohibition upon placing alternative fuel capability requirements upon gas customers that use gas for purposes of cogeneration applicable to a generator using advanced electrical distributed generation technology. These provisions would not apply to an advanced electrical distributed generation technology that is first operational at a site on and after January 1, 2014.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Aug 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly May 21, 2009
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 36
Aug 31, 2009
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 2. Page 3270.)
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-4)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 26, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
May 21, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-8-5)
assembly
May 12, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FF
Felipe Fuentes
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1110
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1110. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline