Environmental protection: California Environmental Protection Agency: rules: economic analysis.
Summary
Existing law requires the California Environmental Protection Agency, or a board, department, or office within the agency, to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences, the University of California, the California State University, or any similar scientific institution of higher learning, or any combination of those entities, or with a scientist or group of scientists of comparable stature and qualifications that are recommended by the President of the University of California, to conduct an external scientific peer review of the scientific basis for any rule, as defined to include specified regulations and policies, proposed by any board, department, or office within the agency, and prescribes procedures for conducting that scientific peer review. This bill would, at or before the time a rule proposed for adoption is made available to the public at a public workshop or for purposes of public comment, require the California Environmental Protection Agency, or a board, department, or office within the agency, to complete and place into the rulemaking record an economic analysis, as defined, of the rule. The bill would also require the agency to solicit public comment on the economic analysis in the same manner as on the proposed rule. The bill would allow any interested person, within 15 calendar days of the date of the public workshop or public hearing, to request the agency to submit the economic analysis to external peer review, and would prescribe procedures for conducting the external peer review.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Last action Feb 2, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
2
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jan 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jan 5, 2010
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and E.S. & T.M.
lower
Jan 4, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Further hearing to be set.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1107
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1107. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline