Parks and open space: Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor: boundary revisions.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that, if the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy determines, based on relevant scientific information and land use planning studies, that a revision of the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of Placerita Canyon State Park east of Route 14, including Whitney Canyon, is necessary, the executive director of the conservancy is required to prepare and file with the Secretary of State and specified committees of the Legislature, a revised map showing the changes in the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. This bill, instead, would authorize the conservancy to revise the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of the City of Santa Clarita, including Whitney Canyon, Elsmere Canyon, and their adjacent watersheds. An owner of property located in Elsmere Canyon would be authorized to request of the conservancy that his or her property be included within the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. The conservancy, upon receipt of the request, would be authorized, in accordance with specified procedures, to revise the map showing the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor to include the property in Elsmere Canyon that is the subject of the request. The bill would provide that the above authorization to the property owner would not affect inclusion of the property in the corridor pursuant to other provisions of law. (2) Existing law prohibits the provision related to the revision of boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor from being interpreted to affect any portion of Elsmere Canyon, or from affecting the decision of whether to permit Elsmere Canyon as a solid waste facility. The bill would delete that provision. (3) The bill also would make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 13, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Jun 1, 2009
How they voted
33–4
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican14
64% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-4-2)
senate
Aug 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Jul 6, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 23).
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and RLS.
upper
Jun 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-1-3)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13).
lower
Feb 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 110
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 110. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline