School facilities: construction.
Summary
Existing law, the Field Act, requires the Department of General Services under the police power of the state to supervise the design and construction of a school building, as defined, or the reconstruction or alteration of, or addition to, a school building, if not exempted under specified law, to ensure that plans and specifications comply with adopted rules and regulations and building standards published in regulations, and to ensure that the work of construction is performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications for the protection of life and property. As the work of construction or alteration progresses and when the department requires, the licensed architect or structural engineer in charge of observing construction or registered engineer in charge of observing other work, the inspector on the work, and the contractor are each required to submit reports, based on personal knowledge, as defined, to the department that the work and materials comply with the approved plans and specifications. When the construction is completed, notice of completion is filed, specified reports are submitted to the department, and all required fees are paid, the department is required to issue a certification that the school building complies with the requirements of the Field Act. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the contractor submit periodic reports to the department that the work and materials comply with the approved plans and specifications and would eliminate the requirement that notice of completion be filed before the department issues a certification that the school building complies with the Field Act requirements. The bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 21, 2009
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 74
May 21, 2009
D
Democratic47
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 9, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 21, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-3)
assembly
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jean Fuller
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1099
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1099. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline