Sexual assault crimes.
Summary
Existing law, the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights, authorizes a law enforcement agency investigating certain felony sex offenses, upon the request of the victim, and subject to the commitment of resources, to inform the victim whether or not a DNA profile was obtained from the testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence from the case, whether or not that information has been entered into the Department of Justice Data Bank of case evidence, and whether or not there is a match between the DNA profile developed from the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence and a DNA profile contained in the Department of Justice Convicted Offender DNA Data Base, as specified. Existing law also requires that the victim be given written notification by the law enforcement agency if the law enforcement agency elects not to perform DNA testing of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence, or intends to destroy or dispose of the rape kit evidence or other crime scene evidence prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, as specified. Existing law provides that the sole civil or criminal remedy available to a sexual assault victim for a law enforcement agency's failure to fulfill its responsibilities under the Sexual Assault Victims' DNA Bill of Rights is standing to file a writ of mandamus to require compliance with these notification provisions. This bill would require local law enforcement agencies responsible for taking or processing rape kit evidence to annually report to the Department of Justice statistical information pertaining to the processing of rape kits, as specified. The reports received would be subject to inspection under the California Public Records Act. These provisions would become inoperative on July 1, 2015, and would be repealed on January 1, 2016. By imposing additional reporting duties on local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Sep 2, 2009
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
13
Committee
12
Amendments
10
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3107.)
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 2, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-6)
senate
Aug 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 19, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-0-1)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 13, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 2, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1017
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1017. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline