Governing boards: pupil members.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district maintaining one or more high schools to appoint to its membership one or more nonvoting pupil members if pupils petition the governing board to make those appointments. This bill would require the governing board to appoint the pupil member or members within 30 days of receiving the petition, or at its next regularly scheduled meeting if no meeting is held within those 30 days, as specified. Because the bill would require school districts to provide a higher level of service, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the governing board to adopt a resolution authorizing a pupil advisory board to assist the pupil member or members in executing duties relating to serving on the board. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 26, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly May 18, 2009
How they voted
27–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican15
66% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
12
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Jan 14, 2010
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 26, 2009
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 60. Noes 15. Page 3199.)
lower
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-10-3)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 15).
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 22, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 18, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-11-5)
assembly
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1007
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1007. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline