Public employment: furloughs.
Summary
Existing law sets forth the general policy that the workweek of a state employee shall be 40 hours and authorizes workweeks of different hours to be established in order to meet varying needs of different state agencies. Existing law also authorizes the Governor to require that the 40-hour workweek be worked in 4 days in any state agency or part thereof when the Governor determines that the best interests of the state would be served thereby. Existing law vests the Department of Personnel Administration with the duties and responsibilities exercised by the State Personnel Board with respect to the administration of salaries, hours, and other personnel-related matters. This bill would exempt employees in positions funded at least 95% by sources other than the General Fund, employees of the Franchise Tax Board, and employees of the State Board of Equalization from furloughs implemented by any state agency, board, or commission. The bill would also prohibit a state agency, board, or commission from directly or indirectly implementing, or assisting in implementing, a furlough of those employees. The bill would define "employee" for the purpose of those provisions and would also specify that nothing in those provisions shall be construed as legal authorization for the imposition of furloughs on employees through an Executive order. The bill would also make related findings and declarations in support of this measure. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on January 8, 2010. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 8, 2010, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Feb 2010
Senate Passage
Feb 2010
Assembly Passage
Mar 2010
Vetoed
Mar 2010
Introduced Feb 5, 2010
Vetoed Mar 24, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly Mar 8, 2010
How they voted
27–5
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Feb 18, 2010
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
41% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Mar 24, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Mar 8, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-5-2)
assembly
Mar 8, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 27. Noes 7. Page 114.) To enrollment.
upper
Feb 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.)
lower
Feb 22, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 18, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-5-3)
senate
Feb 17, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 79.)
upper
Feb 16, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 62.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 10, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 5, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Co
AH
Alyson Huber
DDemocratic
Co
Dave Cox
RRepublican
Co
Denise Moreno Ducheny
DDemocratic
Co
HD
Hector De La Torre
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 29
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 29. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline