County sales and use taxes: rate increase.
Summary
The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law (Bradley-Burns Law) authorizes a county and a city and county to impose a local sales and use tax, and similarly authorizes a city, located within a county imposing such a tax rate, to impose a local sales tax rate that is credited against the county rate. Existing law requires a city, county, or city and county imposing a local sales and use tax pursuant to the Bradley-Burns Law to contract with the State Board of Equalization to administer the local sales and use tax. Existing law authorizes a county or city and county to contract with the State Board of Equalization to establish a local transportation fund in the county treasury for the deposit of 14 of 1% of the revenues collected for the county or city and county under the Bradley-Burns Law for specified transportation purposes. This bill would authorize a county or city and county to impose an additional 14 of 1% sales and use tax rate under the Bradley-Burns Law. This bill would require a county or city and county that imposes this additional rate to deposit all revenues derived therefrom, less specified administrative costs, into a local transportation fund, as specified. This bill would also require a county or a city and county that imposes this additional tax to comply with the applicable voter-approval requirements of a specified provision of the California Constitution. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 1, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 1, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would become operative only if Assembly Bill 2 of the 2009-10 First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature is chaptered
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Dec 2008
Assembly Passage
Dec 2008
Vetoed
Jan 2009
Introduced Dec 8, 2008
Vetoed Jan 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Dec 18, 2008 · Assembly Dec 18, 2008
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Dec 18, 2008
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
1
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Jan 6, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Dec 18, 2008
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-1)
senate
Dec 18, 2008
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 34.) To enrollment.
upper
Dec 18, 2008
Introduced
Amended. (Page 35.)
lower
Dec 8, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Denise Moreno Ducheny
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 6
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 6. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline