Tax: withholding on payments for goods and services.
Summary
Existing law requires every employer who pays wages to an employee for services performed in this state to withhold from those wages, except as provided, specified income taxes, and authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to impose specified requirements for withholding of those taxes. This bill would modify existing law to extend that withholding requirement to payments made to a private entity or person pursuant to a contract for goods or services, as provided. This bill would specify that the withholding rate applicable to those payments would be 3%, and would exempt from the withholding requirement, among other payments, the first $600 of a payment for goods or services made to the contracting party in a calendar year. This bill would allow the Franchise Tax Board to have access to the information filed with the Employment Development Department, and would require the department to create and publish forms for reporting and remitting payments made pursuant to a contract for goods or services, as specified. This bill would establish a new crime with respect to the failure to withhold taxes, and thus would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 1, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 1, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Assembly Passage
Dec 2008
Senate Passage
Dec 2008
Vetoed
Jan 2009
Introduced Dec 8, 2008
Vetoed Jan 6, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Dec 18, 2008 · Assembly Dec 8, 2008
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Dec 18, 2008
D
Democratic22
95% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Jan 6, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Dec 18, 2008
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-1)
senate
Dec 18, 2008
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 49.)
lower
Dec 18, 2008
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Dec 8, 2008
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-1-5)
assembly
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
NE
Noreen Evans
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 12
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 12. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline