Photo of Warren Petersen
R Arizona Senate · District 14

Sen. Warren Petersen

Compare
Total votes
2,872
all sessions
Attendance
99%
36 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
92%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
5%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
106
bills & resolutions
Lower than 97% of chamber peers
Committees
4
assignments
106 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
106
Primary
38
Co-sponsor
68
This page
106
matching current filters
Primary SB 1741
Vetoed · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
public schools; released time courses

Maddy summarySB 1741, the Arizona Released Time Education Act, permits Arizona public school districts and charter schools to allow students to attend external religious courses during regular school hours with parental consent. The courses must provide religious instruction for 1-5 hours weekly, be taught by qualified instructors, and include provider-managed transportation and student safety responsibilities. Schools must award academic credit using secular criteria (like instructional hours and materials) and count the time as instructional hours, but cannot pay for courses or host them on school property. Individuals harmed by violations can seek legal remedies including damages and attorney fees.

Vetoed Jun 19, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 1186
Vetoed · Arizona Senate · Co-sponsor
document retention; proposals; donations

Maddy summarySB 1186 requires companies bidding on state contracts or applying for state grants to disclose any "anything of value" (like donations or loans) they or their executives provided to the governor or related entities (such as campaign committees or political groups supporting the governor) within the past five years. It also mandates that state agencies retain all notes from proposal evaluations and prohibits destroying these notes; if notes are destroyed, related contracts may need to be re-bid. The bill directly affects businesses seeking state contracts or grants by adding transparency requirements about their political contributions. Key provisions include mandatory disclosure for both contract proposals (Section 1) and grant applications (Section 3), alongside new record retention rules for procurement evaluations (Section 2).

Vetoed Jun 19, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 1055
Passed · Arizona Senate · Co-sponsor
death resolution; Bill Van Dyke

Maddy summarySenate Concurrent Resolution 1055 is a commemorative measure that honors the life and service of Major General Glen W. 'Bill' Van Dyke, a retired Arizona National Guard leader who passed away in April 2026. The resolution formally recognizes his nearly 38 years of military and public service, including his roles as a pilot, commander of the 162nd Fighter Group, and Adjutant General of Arizona. It expresses the legislature's condolences to Van Dyke's family and friends while acknowledging his contributions to the state and nation.

Passed Jun 13, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HCR 2063
Introduced · Arizona House · Co-sponsor
Yvonne Fedderson; death resolution

Maddy summaryThis is a commemorative resolution (HCR 2063), not a substantive bill. It honors Yvonne Glee Lime Fedderson, founder of Childhelp and a global humanitarian dedicated to child welfare, following her death on January 23, 2026. The resolution expresses the Arizona Legislature's sympathy to her family and admirers, and directs the Secretary of State to send copies of the resolution to her family and Childhelp. It has no policy provisions or impact on legislation.

Introduced Jun 13, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 1566
Signed into law · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
malicious delay; enforcement; penalty

Maddy summarySB 1566 prohibits cities, counties, and state agencies in Arizona from maliciously delaying responses to license, permit, or approval applications. It defines "malicious" as acting in bad faith to obstruct approvals through unauthorized requirements, unexplained delays, or selective enforcement - not due to resource limits or legitimate rule enforcement. Violating entities face a $5,000 civil penalty per violation, enforceable by the attorney general or county attorney. The bill aims to prevent government obstruction of routine applications while allowing reasonable processing time.

Signed into law May 29, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 1232
Signed into law · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
military compatibility permit zoning

Maddy summarySB 1232 amends Arizona's advertising regulations by redefining "business area" to explicitly include zones permitted under a "military compatibility permit" for commercial or industrial use. This change directly affects commercial developers and property owners near military installations who operate within areas designated for military compatibility. The bill's key mechanism updates zoning definitions to ensure these military-compatible zones are treated as standard commercial areas for advertising and development purposes, rather than being restricted as outdoor advertising zones. This clarifies that land within such permits - originally intended to allow military operations without conflict - is now recognized as part of legitimate commercial zones under existing zoning laws.

Signed into law May 29, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 1786
Passed · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
artificial intelligence; content verification

Maddy summaryThis Arizona bill requires companies providing generative AI tools to Arizona residents to embed unremovable origin information in AI-generated content like images, videos, or audio. Covered providers must use standard methods (e.g., watermarks) to include provenance data showing the content's source and modifications, while minor edits like brightness adjustments or cropping are excluded. The law aims to increase transparency about AI content creation and prevent misleading content by making it clear when media is AI-generated. It directly affects AI companies operating publicly in Arizona for personal use, requiring them to implement these verification measures.

Passed May 5, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor HCR 2047
Passed · Arizona House · Co-sponsor
legitimacy; Judea and Samaria; recognition

Maddy summaryHCR 2047 is a symbolic Arizona legislative resolution recognizing the historical and biblical significance of "Judea and Samaria" as the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people. It formally rejects the term "West Bank" as a political construct and mandates that Arizona state government use "Judea and Samaria" in all official communications and documents regarding the territory. The resolution cites biblical references, historical claims, and legal arguments (including the San Remo Resolution and League of Nations Mandate) to support its position. As a concurrent resolution, it has no legal effect on international borders or U.S. policy but reflects Arizona's official stance on terminology. It does not alter any existing laws or policies related to the region.

Passed Apr 21, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 1107
Signed into law · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
peace officer certification; alternative pathway

Maddy summaryThis bill amends retirement plan provisions for Arizona peace officers. It establishes medical examination requirements for peace officers and outlines specific withdrawal options for those who leave employment before retirement. The bill specifies that peace officers with less than five years of service can withdraw their accumulated contributions, while those with five or more years can withdraw their contributions plus a percentage based on their years of service (ranging from 25% for 5-5.9 years to 100% for 10+ years). The bill also details payment timelines, interest provisions, and options for rolling over funds into other retirement accounts. This primarily affects current and former Arizona peace officers who are members of retirement plans.

Signed into law Apr 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 1787
Vetoed · Arizona Senate · Lead sponsor
exactions; individualized determinations; appeal

Maddy summaryThis bill requires Arizona municipalities and counties to provide developers with a written explanation for any fee or condition (called an "exaction") imposed on a proposed development project before it can be charged. Developers can request a detailed, individualized analysis showing how the fee matches the project's specific impacts within 60 days, or the fee is automatically waived if not provided on time. If developers believe a fee is excessive, they can appeal to the Attorney General or sue in court, where local governments must prove the fee is proportional to the project's impact. Developers may also pay fees while appealing without losing their right to challenge them later.

Vetoed Apr 7, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1 to 10 of 106 bills
1 2 3 11 Next