Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
7
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Flavio Bravo
68% support rate
Top opponent
Anna Abeytia
40% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Arizona

Legislators moving environment in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Flavio Bravo
Flavio Bravo Senate · District 26
D
Support
68% 69
Lela Alston
Lela Alston Senate · District 5
D
Support
64% 84
Brian Fernandez
Brian Fernandez Senate · District 23
D
Support
64% 72
Pamela Carter
Pamela Carter House · District 4
R
Support
63% 141
Kiana Sears
Kiana Sears Senate · District 9
D
Support
63% 81
Anna Abeytia
Anna Abeytia House · District 24
D
Oppose
40% 117
Stacey Travers
Stacey Travers House · District 12
D
Mixed −
40% 123
Nancy Gutierrez
Nancy Gutierrez House · District 18
D
Mixed −
42% 122
Mariana Sandoval
Mariana Sandoval House · District 23
D
Mixed −
42% 139
Aaron Marquez
Aaron Marquez House · District 5
D
Mixed −
42% 141
Showing 7 of 7 bills

All environment bills

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1445: water quality; testing; on-site

SB 1445 modifies Arizona's water quality regulations to allow small municipalities (with populations between 1,000 and 10,000) to use EPA-approved on-site equipment for bacteriological testing of wastewater. It updates permit requirements for facilities discharging pollutants, including specifying that small towns may conduct this testing on-site instead of sending samples to external labs. The bill directly affects local governments and wastewater facilities in smaller communities by streamlining testing procedures while maintaining EPA standards. It also clarifies permit processes for aquifer protection and aligns with federal Clean Water Act requirements.
failed · Arizona · House Jun 10, 2026

HB 2494: certificate; environmental compatibility; zoning; exemption

HB 2494 creates special zoning districts for aggregate mining operations in Arizona counties. It requires county boards to establish these districts based on petitions from residents near existing operations and form committees with equal representation from mining operators and community members to set local rules. The bill exempts aggregate mining from standard zoning restrictions within designated districts while requiring operators to follow specific environmental and operational standards for dust, noise, and site reclamation. This directly affects counties establishing zoning districts and aggregate mining operators seeking to expand or operate within these areas.
vetoed · Arizona · House May 5, 2026

HB 4144: 2026-2027; environment.

This bill outlines how specific environmental funds in Arizona can be used during the 2026-2027 fiscal year. It allows money from the underground storage tank fund to cover administrative costs and address sewage discharge problems in border areas like Naco. The legislation also permits the use of water banking and water protection funds to pay legal fees and cover departmental administrative expenses. Additionally, it sets a $15 million spending cap for the water quality assurance revolving fund and keeps vehicle emissions testing fees at their 2025 levels. Although the bill passed the legislature, it was vetoed by the Governor.
passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCR 2020: for-sale housing; development; groundwater replenishment

HCR 2020 is a non-binding legislative resolution expressing support for for-sale housing developments outside designated water service areas, provided they enroll in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD) and replenish groundwater as required by Arizona's water rules. It directly affects new housing projects in Phoenix, Pinal, and Tucson active management areas by requiring groundwater replenishment to offset usage. The resolution highlights that CAGRD has enabled over 400,000 homes to be built without impacting groundwater tables since 1995, aligning with existing state water management requirements.
signed · Arizona · Senate Apr 15, 2026

SB 1503: public pensions; proxy voting

SB 1503 requires Arizona public pension funds to vote shares solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries, directly affecting state-run pension managers and proxy advisory firms. It mandates that if a pension fund votes against a company's board recommendation (with majority independent directors), it must provide a documented economic analysis proving the vote aligns with financial goals, not environmental or ideological aims. Funds must annually report such votes and analyses to the state treasurer and back-test their economic models every three years to ensure accuracy. The bill prohibits using votes to advance non-financial goals unless an economic analysis confirms financial benefits, with strict certification requirements for all documentation.
passed · Arizona · Senate Mar 26, 2026

SB 1176: stormwater storage; replenishment credits

SB 1176 creates a system for earning "replenishment credits" by storing stormwater in specially permitted underground facilities within the Phoenix Active Management Area. It allows entities (referred to as "storer") to recharge stormwater, with the director crediting 95% of the volume stored annually toward offsetting future groundwater use obligations. These credits can be used within two miles of the storage site to offset groundwater withdrawals or transferred to eligible entities within the same groundwater subbasin. The bill formalizes this credit mechanism under Arizona Revised Statutes sections 45-837.01 and 45-831.01, directly affecting water users and developers managing stormwater in Phoenix-area aquifers.
failed · Arizona · Senate Mar 19, 2026

SB 1019: public water systems; fluoride; prohibition

This bill amends Arizona law to prohibit the use of lead in public water systems, requiring all new or modified water infrastructure to meet specific non-lead standards before construction or installation. It affects public water system operators, municipalities, and construction companies by mandating that plans and specifications for water treatment plants, distribution systems, and related devices be submitted for review to ensure compliance with lead-free requirements. The legislation also establishes fee structures for plan reviews, sets simplified procedures for small systems serving fewer than 3,300 people, and requires water quality testing and reporting to prevent lead contamination in drinking water.