Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
24
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Flavio Bravo
68% support rate
Top opponent
Anna Abeytia
40% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Arizona

Legislators moving environment in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Flavio Bravo
Flavio Bravo Senate · District 26
D
Support
68% 69
Lela Alston
Lela Alston Senate · District 5
D
Support
64% 84
Brian Fernandez
Brian Fernandez Senate · District 23
D
Support
64% 72
Pamela Carter
Pamela Carter House · District 4
R
Support
63% 141
Kiana Sears
Kiana Sears Senate · District 9
D
Support
63% 81
Anna Abeytia
Anna Abeytia House · District 24
D
Oppose
40% 117
Stacey Travers
Stacey Travers House · District 12
D
Mixed −
40% 123
Nancy Gutierrez
Nancy Gutierrez House · District 18
D
Mixed −
42% 122
Mariana Sandoval
Mariana Sandoval House · District 23
D
Mixed −
42% 139
Aaron Marquez
Aaron Marquez House · District 5
D
Mixed −
42% 141
Showing 1–10 of 24 bills

All environment bills

signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 22, 2026

SB 1335: water banking; annual report; posting

SB 1335 requires Arizona's water banking commission to submit an annual report by July 1st each year, detailing all transactions and activities related to the state's water banking fund. The report must include specific financial accounting (monies expended and remaining), water storage volumes, long-term credit distributions, and a 10-year plan for future water banking services - including protecting against Colorado River shortages and supporting tribal water rights settlements. The commission must also post this report on its public website. This bill focuses solely on transparency and reporting requirements for the existing water banking program.
vetoed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1445: water quality; testing; on-site

SB 1445 modifies Arizona's water quality regulations to allow small municipalities (with populations between 1,000 and 10,000) to use EPA-approved on-site equipment for bacteriological testing of wastewater. It updates permit requirements for facilities discharging pollutants, including specifying that small towns may conduct this testing on-site instead of sending samples to external labs. The bill directly affects local governments and wastewater facilities in smaller communities by streamlining testing procedures while maintaining EPA standards. It also clarifies permit processes for aquifer protection and aligns with federal Clean Water Act requirements.
vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2013: exceptional events; air quality; wildfires

HB 2013 amends Arizona's air quality statute to clarify how the state handles "exceptional events" like wildfires. It requires the state air quality agency to develop policy statements for such events, considering Arizona's unique conditions, and mandates submitting wildfire-related demonstrations to the U.S. EPA if federally managed wildfires affect the state. The bill also adds a requirement for the agency to issue daily PM-10 dust forecasts for nonattainment areas, identifying risk levels based on weather, pollution data, and historical patterns. These changes directly affect the state air quality agency's procedures for managing air pollution during extreme events.
failed · Arizona · House Jun 10, 2026

HB 2494: certificate; environmental compatibility; zoning; exemption

HB 2494 creates special zoning districts for aggregate mining operations in Arizona counties. It requires county boards to establish these districts based on petitions from residents near existing operations and form committees with equal representation from mining operators and community members to set local rules. The bill exempts aggregate mining from standard zoning restrictions within designated districts while requiring operators to follow specific environmental and operational standards for dust, noise, and site reclamation. This directly affects counties establishing zoning districts and aggregate mining operators seeking to expand or operate within these areas.
vetoed · Arizona · House May 5, 2026

HB 4144: 2026-2027; environment.

This bill outlines how specific environmental funds in Arizona can be used during the 2026-2027 fiscal year. It allows money from the underground storage tank fund to cover administrative costs and address sewage discharge problems in border areas like Naco. The legislation also permits the use of water banking and water protection funds to pay legal fees and cover departmental administrative expenses. Additionally, it sets a $15 million spending cap for the water quality assurance revolving fund and keeps vehicle emissions testing fees at their 2025 levels. Although the bill passed the legislature, it was vetoed by the Governor.
passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCR 2020: for-sale housing; development; groundwater replenishment

HCR 2020 is a non-binding legislative resolution expressing support for for-sale housing developments outside designated water service areas, provided they enroll in the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD) and replenish groundwater as required by Arizona's water rules. It directly affects new housing projects in Phoenix, Pinal, and Tucson active management areas by requiring groundwater replenishment to offset usage. The resolution highlights that CAGRD has enabled over 400,000 homes to be built without impacting groundwater tables since 1995, aligning with existing state water management requirements.
signed · Arizona · Senate Apr 15, 2026

SB 1503: public pensions; proxy voting

SB 1503 requires Arizona public pension funds to vote shares solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries, directly affecting state-run pension managers and proxy advisory firms. It mandates that if a pension fund votes against a company's board recommendation (with majority independent directors), it must provide a documented economic analysis proving the vote aligns with financial goals, not environmental or ideological aims. Funds must annually report such votes and analyses to the state treasurer and back-test their economic models every three years to ensure accuracy. The bill prohibits using votes to advance non-financial goals unless an economic analysis confirms financial benefits, with strict certification requirements for all documentation.
passed · Arizona · House Apr 14, 2026

HB 2918: renewable energy equipment; valuation; depreciation

HB 2918 changes how renewable energy and storage equipment is valued for property tax purposes in Arizona through 2040. It sets different valuation rules: non-utility-owned equipment is taxed at 100% of its depreciated cost, while utility-owned equipment is taxed at 20% of depreciated cost before January 1, 2027, and 100% after that date. The bill caps depreciation at 90% of the equipment's original cost and explicitly includes all energy storage (both co-located with solar/wind and standalone). This directly affects owners of renewable energy projects, including utilities and private developers, by altering their property tax burden based on ownership type and installation timeline.
signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2117: natural resource conservation board; fund

HB 2117 redirects $17 of the $25 annual fee for Arizona's environmental special license plates into a dedicated fund. The state natural resource conservation board will distribute $5,000 to $10,000 annually to each natural resource conservation district with an established education center. These funds must support environmental education programs that are scientifically based and address economic and social implications. The bill specifies that funds are exclusively for conservation education programs at local districts, without changing the plate fee structure.
failed · Arizona · House Apr 8, 2026

HB 2795: small modular reactors; zoning; approval

HB 2795 modifies Arizona law to allow small modular reactor (SMR) construction and operation by preventing local governments from restricting these projects under specific conditions. It requires SMR developers to obtain federal early site permits and design certifications, then submit proof of these to the county board of supervisors before local zoning rules can be overridden. This directly affects SMR developers and Arizona counties, ensuring federal approvals supersede local zoning for eligible projects. The law does not alter federal requirements but clarifies that counties cannot block SMR sites once the federal steps are completed and documented.
Showing 1 to 10 of 24 bills
1 2 3 Next