Police dogs; emergency medical services personnel authorized to provide medical care and transport to those injured in line of duty; immunity from liability therefor provided
House Bill 366, also known as the Lakyn Canine Act, authorizes emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to provide emergency medical care to police dogs injured in the line of duty. It also permits EMS personnel to transport these injured police dogs to veterinary facilities, provided no human requires medical attention or transport at that time. The bill grants immunity from criminal or civil liability for EMS personnel who provide such care in good faith. Additionally, it provides immunity for EMS personnel who choose to refuse treatment or transport for an injured police dog. This act is set to become effective on October 1, 2025.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Feb 27, 2025
Signed May 14, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Engrossed
→
Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
May 14, 2025
MINOR
The bill was finalized as an enrolled act, moving from its engrossed state. The most significant substantive change is the addition of a new subsection (c) and a revised subsection (d), which clarify that emergency medical services personnel can only transport injured police dogs if no human patient requires immediate attention or transport at that time. This adds a critical safety constraint to the bill's original intent, ensuring human lives take precedence over animal transport during emergencies.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability was narrowed by adding a condition that EMS personnel must prioritize human patients before transporting injured police dogs.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new requirement stating that EMS personnel may only transport an injured police dog if there is no individual requiring medical attention or transport at the time.
Reorganized the text of subsection (d) to follow the new transport restriction, clarifying that medical care and immunity apply when the dog is injured at the scene or being transported under the new condition.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header from 'Engrossed' to 'Enrolled' and adjusted the certification language to reflect final passage by both the House and Senate.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass - Adopted Roll Call 965
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee Second House
upper
Apr 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Pending Committee Action in Second House (Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry)
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 598
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 597
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Introduced
Agriculture and Forestry 1st Substitute Offered (Agriculture and Forestry)
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (Agriculture and Forestry)
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rick Rehm
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 366
Scope: AL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 366. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline