Relating to: banning the use of genetic software from foreign adversaries in medical and research facilities, the storage of any human genome sequencing data within the borders of a foreign adversary, and providing a penalty. (FE)
AB 673 bans medical and research facilities receiving state or federal funds from using genetic software or sequencers developed by foreign adversaries (as defined by federal regulations). It also prohibits storing human genome data of state residents in foreign adversary countries, with exceptions for certain clinical trials. The law applies to facilities, companies, and nonprofits handling genetic data, requiring them to keep such data inaccessible to foreign adversaries. Violations carry a $10,000 penalty per offense, enforced by the state Attorney General.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Nov 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Assembly Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Vetoed
Mar 2026
Introduced Nov 19, 2025
Vetoed Mar 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Bill Text
→
Text as Enrolled
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was finalized into law with specific definitions and enforcement details added. The most significant change is the explicit inclusion of six specific countries (China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela) in the definition of a 'foreign adversary,' replacing a vague reference to a federal list. Additionally, the penalty for violations was clarified to apply to both prohibited device usage and data storage, and the data storage exemption was updated to reference specific federal regulations.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed and clarified by explicitly listing specific countries as foreign adversaries rather than relying solely on a federal list, and the applicability of the data storage exemption was tied to specific federal regulations.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'foreign adversary' was changed from a reference to a federal list to an explicit list of six specific countries: China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela.
A new exemption was added for human genome data collected in clinical trials or biomedical research studies that comply with specific federal regulations (28 CFR Part 202).
ENFORCEMENT
The penalty section was clarified to explicitly state that the $10,000 forfeiture applies to violations of both the device usage prohibition and the data storage prohibition.
TECHNICAL
Standard legal formatting elements, such as the official act title, publication date placeholders, and effective date clauses, were added to finalize the text as law.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly Jan 22, 2026
How they voted
20–14
Passed
Total votes 34
Feb 18, 2026
D
Democratic16
87% Nay
R
Republican18
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Mar 27, 2026
Vetoed
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 13
upper
Feb 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Introduced
Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Introduced
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Introduced
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Moses
lower
Jan 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules
lower
Jan 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to committee on Rules
lower
Jan 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5
lower
Nov 19, 2025
Introduced
Introduced by Representatives Moses, Dallman, Callahan, Kreibich, Kurtz, Piwowarczyk, Mursau, Neylon, Dittrich, Knodl, Green, Behnke and Brill;
cosponsored by Senators Testin, Tomczyk, Jacque and Nass
lower
13 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Adam Neylon
RRepublican
P
Alex Dallman
RRepublican
P
Barbara Dittrich
RRepublican
P
Calvin Callahan
RRepublican
P
Chanz Green
RRepublican
P
Clint Moses
RRepublican
P
Dan Knodl
RRepublican
P
Elijah Behnke
RRepublican
P
Jeff Mursau
RRepublican
P
Jim Piwowarczyk
RRepublican
P
Lindee Brill
RRepublican
P
Rob Kreibich
RRepublican
P
Tony Kurtz
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 673
Scope: WI
Hi! I can help you understand AB 673. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline