Increasing transparency in artificial intelligence.
HB 1168 requires commercial developers of generative AI systems (like text or image tools) to publicly document the data used to train their systems by January 1, 2026. This includes disclosing sources, types, and handling of training data - such as whether personal information or artificially created data was used - before releasing the AI to Washington users. Developers must post this documentation on their websites, with exemptions for AI focused solely on security, aircraft operations, or national defense. Violations carry $5,000 daily fines enforceable by the state attorney general, aiming to increase public awareness of AI development practices.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 12, 2026
Last action Jan 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Bill
→
Substitute Bill
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to expand the definition of 'developer' to include commercial entities while explicitly excluding internal researchers and API users, and to clarify that 'aggregate consumer information' refers to deidentified data. Additionally, the required disclosure of dataset sources was modified to clarify whether data was purchased or publicly available, and the reference for personal information was updated to a different RCW section.
Scope change
The scope of applicability was narrowed regarding who must comply; the definition of 'developer' now explicitly excludes individuals or entities developing AI solely for internal use, research, or via third-party APIs without substantial modification.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'developer' was expanded to require 'primary engagement' in AI design for commercial distribution, while adding specific exclusions for internal use, research, and API-only users.
The definition of 'aggregate consumer information' was updated to explicitly state that it does not mean 'deidentified' records, clarifying the distinction between anonymized and identifiable data.
REQUIREMENT
The requirement to disclose dataset sources was changed to ask if datasets were 'purchased or licensed' or 'publicly available,' replacing the previous option of asking if they were 'purchased or licensed' or 'in the public domain'.
The reference for defining 'personal information' was updated from RCW 19.255.005 to RCW 19.373.010.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Jan 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans.
lower
Jan 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee relieved of further consideration.
lower
Jan 12, 2026
Introduced
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 1:30 PM.
lower
Jan 31, 2025
Committee
Referred to Appropriations.
lower
Jan 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Minority; do not pass.
lower
Jan 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans at 10:30 AM.
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Public hearing in the House Committee on Technology, Economic Development, & Veterans at 10:30 AM.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Clyde Shavers
DDemocratic
Co
Cindy Ryu
DDemocratic
Co
Jamila Taylor
DDemocratic
Co
Mary Fosse
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1168
Scope: WA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1168. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline