Zoning; by-right multifamily residential development.
Summary
Zoning; by-right multifamily development. Requires local zoning ordinances to permit, on any parcel with an existing tree canopy coverage of at less than 60 percent, located within a city or town having a population of more than 20,000 or within a designated metropolitan planning area, multifamily and mixed-use residential development as a by-right use on at least 75 percent of all land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications, including any land contained in commercial or business zoning district classifications that allow for the by-right development and construction of single-family residential uses. The bill stipulates that any application for a proposed development authorized pursuant to the bill shall be reviewed and acted upon administratively by a locality. The bill prohibits a locality from (i) requiring that a special exception, special use, or conditional use permit be obtained for such development or (ii) imposing more stringent land use requirements, enumerated in the bill, for such development than would otherwise be required. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2027.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Last action Mar 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
Counties, Cities and Towns Substitute
→
Delegate Helmer Substitute
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill was reformatted from a House Substitute to a Delegate Helmer Floor Amendment, with no substantive policy changes to the zoning provisions. The text remains identical in meaning, though line breaks and spacing were adjusted for the floor amendment format.
TECHNICAL
Formatting changes only: bill title changed from 'HOUSE SUBSTITUTE' to 'HOUSE SUBSTITUTE' with different line breaks, bill number changed from 26108775D to 26109131D, and amendment type changed from 'AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE' to 'FLOOR AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE' to reflect it was proposed by Delegate Helmer on March 4, 2026 instead of the House Committee on February 27, 2026.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 3, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Feb 3, 2026
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican19
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Rereferred to Counties, Cities and Towns
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reconsideration of passed by for the day
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed by for the day
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns with substitute (11-Y 10-N)
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
House committee offered
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
lower
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and passed Senate (21-Y 19-N 0-A)
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Engrossed by Senate as amended (Voice Vote)
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senator VanValkenburg Amendments agreed to
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Reading of amendments waived (Voice Vote)
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Floor offered Senator VanValkenburg Amendments
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day (Voice Vote)
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Local Government with substitute (8-Y 4-N 3-A)
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate committee offered
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Local Government
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 454
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 454. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline