Law-enforcement officers; restrictions on wearing of facial coverings, exceptions, penalty.
Summary
Law-enforcement officers; restrictions on wearing of facial coverings; exceptions; penalty. Prohibits any law-enforcement officer, defined in the bill, from wearing a facial covering, defined in the bill, while engaged in the performance of his official duties. The bill sets out several exceptions to such prohibition, including protective facial coverings to protect against disease, infection, and exposure to toxic substances and facial coverings worn by any law-enforcement officer assigned to a special weapons and tactics team while engaged in the performance of his official duties with such team. The bill subjects the law-enforcement officer to disciplinary action, including dismissal, demotion, suspension, transfer, or decertification, and creates a Class 1 misdemeanor for any law-enforcement officer who wears a facial covering in violation of the provisions of the bill unless the law-enforcement agency that employs such law-enforcement officer has adopted and established a written policy for and restrictions on the use of facial coverings. The bill also directs the Department of Criminal Justice Services to develop a model policy for and restrictions on the use of facial coverings by law-enforcement officers. This bill is identical to SB 352.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Vetoed
Apr 2026
Introduced Jan 23, 2026
Vetoed Apr 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
Courts of Justice Substitute
→
Governor Substitute
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was converted from a Senate Substitute to a Governor Substitute, changing the filing date and adding a new section that allows private citizens to sue law enforcement officers for civil damages if the officers knowingly wear facial coverings in violation of the law. The scope of the bill was also expanded to include a new section in Title 8.01 regarding civil liability, while the core training and operational restrictions in Title 9.1 and 19.2 remain largely consistent.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded by adding a new section (8.01-42.7) that creates a civil cause of action for individuals injured by law enforcement officers who illegally wear facial coverings, whereas the previous version did not include this private right of action.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new section allowing injured persons to sue law enforcement officers for actual damages or $10,000 (whichever is greater) plus attorney fees if the officer knowingly wore a facial covering in violation of the statute.
TECHNICAL
Changed the document header from 'Senate Substitute' to 'Governor Substitute' and updated the date from February 25, 2026, to April 13, 2026.
Adjusted the list of sections to be amended and reenacted to include the new section 8.01-42.7 alongside the existing sections.
SCOPE
Amended the bill description to reflect the addition of a new section numbered 8.01-42.7, which was not present in the Senate version.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 5, 2026 · House of Delegates Feb 12, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Mar 5, 2026
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
49
Key actions
18
Committee
13
Amendments
2
Apr 12, 2026
Vetoed
Governor's recommendation received by House
executive
Mar 31, 2026
Lower · Passed
Signed by Speaker
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by President
upper
Mar 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB1482ER)
lower
Mar 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Conference report agreed to by House (62-Y 35-N 0-A)
lower
Mar 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Conference report agreed to by Senate (21-Y 18-N 0-A)
upper
Mar 13, 2026
Legislature · Passed
Conference Report released
legislature
Mar 12, 2026
Committee
Senate requested conference committee
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate with substitute (21-Y 19-N 0-A)
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day
upper
Mar 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day Block Vote (Voice Vote)
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day Block Vote (Voice Vote)
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Finance and Appropriations (10-Y 5-N)
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute and rereferred to Finance and Appropriations (9-Y 6-N)
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate committee offered
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
upper
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and passed House (63-Y 35-N 0-A)
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Introduced
Engrossed by House as amended
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
committee amendments agreed to
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported from Public Safety with amendment(s) (15-Y 7-N)
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (4-Y 1-N)
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
House subcommittee offered
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Assigned HMPPS sub: Subcommittee #3
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Public Safety
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
Presented and ordered printed 26105678D
lower
0 primary · 22 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1482
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1482. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline