Address Confidentiality Program; removal of Program participant, penalty.
Summary
Department of Law; Address Confidentiality Program; removal of Program participant; penalty. Permits the Office of the Attorney General to cancel a participant's certification in the Address Confidentiality Program if such Program participant has reached the age of 18, is not incapacitated, and did not submit recertification for participation in the Program within 60 days of his eighteenth birthday. The bill penalizes any individual who knowingly discloses or publishes a Program participant's confidential address or any other confidential information with intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass such Program participant or any other person.
Bill status
passed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Feb 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 7, 2025
Last action Feb 18, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Courts of Justice Substitute
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended from its original introduced version to a Senate substitute version, primarily changing the document title and header information while retaining the core legislative text. The substantive policy content regarding the Address Confidentiality Program remains substantially the same, with no significant changes to eligibility criteria, program requirements, or enforcement mechanisms.
Scope change
The bill's scope and applicability remain unchanged; only the document formatting and header information were modified to reflect it as a Senate substitute rather than an introduced bill.
TECHNICAL
Header information changed from 'Introduced' to 'Senate Substitute' with updated bill number and committee referral details
Formatting adjustments including spacing and line breaks in the document structure
POLICY
Core legislative text regarding the Address Confidentiality Program, including definitions, eligibility requirements, application procedures, and penalties remains substantively the same
Floor votes · Senate Jan 31, 2025 · House of Delegates Feb 10, 2025
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Jan 31, 2025
D
Democratic21
100% Yea
R
Republican19
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Feb 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute and referred to Appropriations (21-Y 1-N)
lower
Feb 10, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (21-1)
house of delegates
Feb 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
upper
Jan 31, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed by for the day
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 0-N)
upper
Jan 7, 2025
Committee
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Emily Jordan
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1092
Scope: VA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1092. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline