S 193 Vermont Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

An act relating to establishing a forensic facility for certain criminal justice-involved persons

This bill establishes a specialized forensic facility in Vermont for individuals charged with serious offenses (those punishable by life imprisonment) who are found incompetent to stand trial, as well as for people acquitted of such offenses. It requires courts to dismiss inactive misdemeanor cases after a period equal to the maximum sentence (e.g., 120 days) unless justice demands otherwise. The facility mandates regular competency evaluations, provides tailored mental health services to restore trial fitness, and sets strict procedures for conditional release, including a 40-day court hearing for acquitted individuals to prove they no longer pose a risk. The bill aims to streamline court processes for these cases while ensuring appropriate mental health treatment and safety considerations.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Jan 6, 2026 Signed May 29, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

As Passed By the Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window) As Passed By the Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window) · 15 edits · May 28, 2026
MAJOR
The official version of S.193 makes several substantive changes from the unofficial version that shift the balance of power toward the state and away from individuals in the forensic facility. The most significant changes include shifting the burden of proof for NGRI commitment from the State's Attorney to the individual, changing misdemeanor dismissal from without prejudice to with prejudice, extending the NGRI hearing window from 48 hours to 40 days, broadening the risk standard to include property damage, and reducing the review frequency for NGRI placements from every six months to every five years.
Scope change
The bill's scope effectively narrows individual protections while broadening state authority over persons in the forensic facility. The NGRI commitment process becomes more difficult to challenge (burden shifted to the individual, longer hearing window, five-year review cycle instead of six-month), the risk standard for continued confinement expands to include property damage, and operational safeguards (24/7 medical staffing, treatment plan deadlines, therapeutic environment requirements) are removed from the statutory text.
ELIGIBILITY

Section 1(a) eligibility criteria changed: the unofficial version required the person to be held without bail or for their release to create a substantial risk of bodily injury. The official version removes this requirement and instead requires the person not be deemed a 'person in need of treatment' under 18 V.S.A. section 7101.

Section 2(e) misdemeanor dismissal for incompetent defendants changed from 'without prejudice' (charges can be refiled later) to 'with prejudice' (charges are permanently dismissed and cannot be refiled).

REQUIREMENT

Section 1(d) competency restoration services changed from 'shall include' (mandatory provision of medication, education, accommodations, habilitation, or other services) to 'may include' (permissive), giving the facility discretion over what services to provide.

Section 1(g) involuntary medication approval standard simplified: the unofficial version required four specific judicial findings (medically appropriate, serves important governmental interests of prosecution, significantly furthers those interests by making competency substantially likely, and less intrusive alternatives unlikely to work). The official version reduces this to a single finding that medication is 'clinically appropriate and is likely to aid in restoration of competency.'

Detailed forensic facility operational requirements removed from the official version, including: therapeutic/recovery-oriented/trauma-informed environment design, 24/7 registered nurse or physician availability, initial treatment plan within 72 hours of transfer, ability to separate population by sex or gender, possible operation of multiple facilities, and staff qualification/licensure/training standards.

Counsel appointment provision removed: the unofficial version entitled persons in the forensic facility to have counsel appointed from Vermont Legal Aid. This is absent from the official simplified text.

TIMELINE

Section 3(b)(1) NGRI post-acquittal hearing deadline changed from 48 hours after admission to 40 days after admission, a substantial extension of time before judicial review.

Section 3(d) NGRI review frequency changed: the unofficial version required the State's Attorney to petition for evaluation every six months or upon clinical certification. The official version reduces this to the Commissioner petitioning every five years or upon certification, a significant reduction in oversight frequency.

Rulemaking section (Sec. 5) changed from detailed requirements for permanent rules covering staffing patterns, quality assurance, clinical oversight, safety protocols, and monitoring compliance, to a simple requirement for emergency rules by January 1, 2027.

Effective dates simplified: the unofficial version had staggered dates (most sections July 1, 2026; Section 4a annual reporting July 1, 2029). The official version uses a single effective date of July 1, 2026 for the entire act.

ENFORCEMENT

Section 3(b)(3) burden of proof for NGRI commitment reversed: the unofficial version required the State's Attorney to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person IS suffering from a qualifying condition creating risk. The official version instead requires the PERSON to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they are NO LONGER suffering from a mental disease or defect.

Section 3(g) victim rights provision removed: the unofficial version allowed victims to express views about the offense and preferences for placement and care at any hearing, with the court able to consider their testimony.

SCOPE

Section 3(c) NGRI placement duration: the unofficial version allowed release once the court found the person no longer suffered from a qualifying condition. The official version specifies an 'indeterminate period' with 'no specified end date,' making continued confinement the default.

The risk standard for NGRI release broadened throughout Section 3 from 'substantial risk of bodily injury to another person' to 'substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another person,' making it harder to meet the release threshold.

FISCAL

The unofficial version's interim report requirement (Sec. 7), due October 1, 2026, which required detailed information on facility location, design, staffing levels, contracting needs, cost estimates, and operational timeline, was replaced with a simple effective date provision of July 1, 2026.

Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2026 · House May 26, 2026

How they voted

271
Passed
Total votes 28
May 28, 2026
D Democratic17
16 Yea 1 Nay
94% Yea
R Republican11
11 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
71
Key actions
29
Committee
24
Amendments
10
May 29, 2026
Signed into law
Senate Message: Signed by Governor June 16, 2026
executive
May 29, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by Governor on June 16, 2026
executive
May 28, 2026
Introduced
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment concurred in
lower
May 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
upper
May 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
As passed by Senate and House
upper
May 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Roll Call, requested by Senator Hashim, Passed -- Needed 15 of 30 to Pass -- Yeas = 29, Nays = 1
upper
May 28, 2026
Introduced
House proposal of amendment concurred in
upper
May 28, 2026
Introduced
House proposal of amendment; text
upper
May 28, 2026
Introduced
House proposal of amendment
upper
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
upper
May 26, 2026
Introduced
Read third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 62 of 124 to Pass -- Yeas = 115, Nays = 9
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Report of Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. Burditt of West Rutland, Arsenault of Williston, Christie of Hartford, Dolan of Essex Junction, Goodnow of Brattleboro, Goslant of Northfield, Harvey of Castleton, LaLonde of South Burlington, Malay of Pittsford, and Oliver of Sheldon moved to amend the report of the Committee on Judiciary, as amended, which was agreed to
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. Wood of Waterbury, Bishop of Colchester, Cole of Hartford, Donahue of Northfield, Eastes of Guilford, Garofano of Essex, Maguire of Rutland City, McGill of Bridport, and Noyes of Wolcott moved to amend the report of the Committee on Judiciary, which was agreed to
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. Squirrell of Underhill recommended for the Committee on Appropriations
lower
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. LaLonde of South Burlington reported for the Committee on Judiciary
lower
May 21, 2026
Introduced
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
May 20, 2026
Introduced
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
May 19, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
lower
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
May 18, 2026
Introduced
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
Apr 3, 2026
Introduced
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
lower
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary amended as moved by Senator Lyons, Benson, Cummings, Gulick, Harrison, Major, and Morley
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably by Senator Lyons for Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Hashim for Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Introduced
Recommendation of amendment to be offered by Senator(s) Lyons
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
upper
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
upper
Jan 6, 2026
Introduced
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ginny Lyons
Ginny Lyons
DDemocratic
VT
Chittenden Southeast