H 727 Vermont House · 2025-2026 Regular Session

An act relating to sustainable data center deployment

H.727 establishes a regulatory framework for data centers in Vermont that use 20 megawatts or more of power. It requires the Public Utility Commission to create a separate ratepayer class and specific contract terms for data centers, including 10-year minimum agreements and cost-sharing mechanisms to prevent existing customers from bearing undue infrastructure costs. Before construction can begin, the Commission must issue a "certificate of public good" after assessing impacts on electric system reliability, local communities, environmental protections (including air/water quality and agricultural soils), and economic benefits. The bill directly affects data center developers, electric utilities, and Vermont ratepayers by mandating standardized contracts and site reviews to balance industry growth with community and environmental safeguards.
Bill status vetoed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Failed
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Vetoed
May 2026
Introduced Jan 21, 2026 Vetoed May 29, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

As Passed by Both House and Senate (OfficialOpens in a new window) As Passed by Both House and Senate (UnofficialOpens in a new window) · 15 edits
MAJOR
The Unofficial version of H.727 (Vermont Sustainable Data Centers Act) makes substantial revisions to the Official version, strengthening cost protections for existing ratepayers, adding a new energy transformation payment mechanism requiring data centers to pay 60 percent of their electricity usage multiplied by the state's alternative compliance payment rate into a fund for energy transformation projects, imposing new demand-side management requirements including virtual power plant participation and combustion backup restrictions, and expanding the definition of 'facility' to capture multi-site integrated operations. The Official version's separate siting/certificate of public good process and financing provisions appear to have been removed or consolidated into the large load service equity contract framework.
SCOPE

The purpose statement changed from describing data centers as an 'essential industry' whose growth should be protected from 'unwarranted costs' to an 'emerging industry' that should 'financially benefit' existing ratepayers and protect them from 'additional costs,' shifting the framing from protection to active financial benefit.

The Official version's separate siting and certificate of public good section (with 14 specific findings criteria including environmental, agricultural, and forest sustainability requirements) appears to have been removed or consolidated into the large load service equity contract approval process in the Unofficial version.

DEFINITION

A new definition of 'electric company' was added, defined as the retail electric company that provides or will provide service to a data center under a large load service equity contract.

The 'facility' definition was expanded to include multiple nonadjacent sites that function as a single integrated operation through shared infrastructure or unified operational protocols under a central management system, closing a potential loophole for operators spreading operations across separate parcels.

REQUIREMENT

Cost protection language was significantly strengthened: 'mitigating the risk of financial exposure' became 'precluding the risk'; 'mitigate the risk of other ratepayer classes paying unwarranted costs' became 'ensure that other ratepayer classes are insulated from all costs associated with data center deployment'; and 'sufficient to mitigate the risk of stranded costs' became 'sufficient to prevent the risk of stranded costs.'

The 10-year minimum contract duration, previously stated in a separate tariff/contract section, is now explicitly embedded in the large load service equity contract requirements.

A new requirement was added for contracts to address load curtailment procedures and priorities during grid emergencies.

A new virtual power plant requirement obligates data centers to participate in a utility-managed virtual power plant if available and technically feasible, or to design and implement a self-managed one in coordination with the electric company.

New combustion-based backup generation restrictions limit fossil fuel generators to emergency power failures only, requiring data centers to prioritize battery storage and on-site renewable energy for all other backup needs.

A new site suitability analysis must be conducted before submitting a land use permit application, assessing the facility's capacity to meet commercial building energy standards, maximize on-site renewables and storage, and implement waste heat recovery for adjacent buildings.

ENFORCEMENT

The Commission's findings approving a large load service equity contract must now be in writing and include a stated rationale for each finding, increasing transparency and accountability.

A new periodic review requirement mandates the Commission review approved contracts at intervals not exceeding two years to verify ongoing compliance, with authority to initiate earlier reviews upon good cause or to protect the public interest.

FISCAL

A new 'energy transformation payment' requires data centers to make an annual payment equal to 60 percent of their prior year's electricity usage multiplied by the alternative compliance payment rate under the Renewable Energy Standard, paid in advance with annual reconciliation. Funds are directed to energy transformation projects, preferably in the hosting community.

The Official version's 'Financing State and Local Benefits' section, which directed the Commissioner of Public Service to develop findings on tax revenue sharing or a gross receipts tax for data centers, appears to have been removed from the Unofficial version.

TIMELINE

The Official version's separate sections requiring a report on regional renewable energy market conditions by January 15, 2027, and a recommendation on data center decommissioning by December 15, 2026, appear to have been removed from the Unofficial version.

Floor votes · Senate May 15, 2026 · House May 29, 2026

How they voted

252
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 28
May 15, 2026
D Democratic17
17 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican11
8 Yea 2 Nay 1
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
50
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
14
May 29, 2026
Vetoed
Veto of the Governor sustained by a vote of Yeas = 83, Nays = 52
lower
May 29, 2026
Vetoed
Notice Calendar: Governor’s Veto
lower
May 29, 2026
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (78-48-13)
house
May 28, 2026
Vetoed
House message: Governor vetoed bill on May 28, 2026
upper
May 28, 2026
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor on May 28, 2026
lower
May 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Delivered to the Governor on May 22, 2026
lower
May 22, 2026
Introduced
House message: House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment
upper
May 20, 2026
Introduced
Senate proposal of amendment concurred in
lower
May 20, 2026
Introduced
Notice Calendar: Senate Proposal of Amendment
lower
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Senate Message: Passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
lower
May 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
upper
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Read 3rd time & passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
upper
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Pending third reading, motion to amend Senate proposal of amendment by Senator(s) Perchlik agreed to
upper
May 15, 2026
Introduced
Proposal of amendment agreed to on roll call, requested by Senator Hashim, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 26, Nays = 3
upper
May 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably by Senator Beck for Committee on Finance
upper
May 15, 2026
Introduced
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with proposal of amendment by Senator Watson for Committee on Natural Resources and Energy
upper
May 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Finance
upper
May 15, 2026
Introduced
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy
upper
May 15, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-2-1)
senate
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable report by Committee on Finance
upper
May 14, 2026
Introduced
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy
upper
May 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Finance per Senate Rule 31
upper
May 12, 2026
Introduced
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Natural Resources and Energy
upper
Apr 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on Finance relieved; bill committed to Committee on Natural Resources and Energy on motion of Senator Cummings
upper
Apr 2, 2026
Introduced
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Finance
upper
Mar 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Report of Committee on Energy and Digital Infrastructure agreed to
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. Ode of Burlington recommended for the Committee on Ways and Means
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Rep. Sibilia of Dover reported for the Committee on Energy and Digital Infrastructure
lower
Mar 25, 2026
Introduced
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Introduced
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Referred to Committee on Ways and Means per Rule 35(a)
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Introduced
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
lower
Jan 21, 2026
Introduced
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Energy and Digital Infrastructure
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Laura Sibilia
Laura Sibilia
IIndependent
VT
Windham-2