S 4199 United States Senate · 118th Congress

JUDGES Act of 2024

This bill adds new federal district court judgeships to address growing case backlogs. It authorizes 66 permanent judgeships to be appointed starting in 2025 (with an additional 34 in 2029) across specific districts in Arizona, California, Texas, Florida, Georgia, New York, and others, based on current caseload data. It also creates temporary judgeships for Oklahoma districts (Eastern and Northern) that expire after five years if vacancies occur. The bill aims to reduce the average of 491 cases per judgeship by increasing staffing in overburdened courts, as identified by the Judicial Conference.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2024
Committee Review
Dec 2024
Senate Passage
Aug 2024
House Passage
Dec 2024
Vetoed
Dec 2024
Introduced Apr 19, 2024 Vetoed Dec 23, 2024
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in Senate Engrossed in Senate · 7 edits · Aug 1, 2024
MODERATE
The Senate engrossed version of S 4199 significantly restructured the timeline for adding federal district judgeships, spreading what was originally two large batches (2025 and 2029) into six smaller tranches from 2025 through 2035. The total number of new judgeships increased slightly from 61 to 63, but the front-loaded 2025 batch was cut from 30 to just 11 positions. The bill also replaced an unlimited funding authorization with specific capped dollar amounts indexed to inflation, and added new provisions for courthouse organization in Utah, Texas, and California, expanded GAO reporting requirements, and mandated public release of the Judicial Conference's judgeship recommendation reports.
TIMELINE

The original two-batch structure (2025 and 2029) was replaced with six biennial tranches spanning 2025 through 2035. The 2025 batch was reduced from 30 judgeships to 11, and new batches were added for 2027, 2031, 2033, and 2035.

SCOPE

Total additional district judgeships increased from 61 to 63 across all tranches, but the distribution among districts was substantially rebalanced. For example, central California went from receiving 5 judges in 2025 and 4 in 2029 (total 9) to receiving a total of 10 spread across six years.

New section 4 adds Moab and Monticello as division locations in the Utah district court; new section 5 adds College Station to the Texas district court organization; new section 6 adds El Centro to the California district court organization.

FISCAL

The original unlimited authorization ('such sums as may be necessary') was replaced with specific capped appropriations: $12.97 million per year for FY2025-2026, rising to $61.12 million per year for FY2035 and beyond, with annual CPI adjustments.

ENFORCEMENT

The original single GAO report on vacant and underutilized courthouses (due within 1 year) was replaced with two broader reports due within 2 years: one evaluating workload measurement accuracy, non-case activities' impact on caseloads, and senior judge policies; and a second assessing federal detention space needs and acquisition challenges.

REQUIREMENT

New section 8 requires the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to make the Judicial Conference's biennial Article III Judgeship Recommendations report publicly available on their website free of charge, including methodology details, caseload data, and court-specific information, with copies submitted to both Judiciary Committees.

TECHNICAL

Technical and conforming amendments to the judgeship tables in 28 U.S.C. section 133(a) were moved from a single consolidated section into each individual year's paragraph, making each tranche self-contained with its own table updates and effective date.

Floor votes · House Dec 12, 2024

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Dec 23, 2024
Vetoed
Vetoed by President.
executive
Dec 12, 2024
Lower · Passed
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 236 - 173 (Roll no. 501). (text: CR H7116-7119)
lower
Dec 12, 2024
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 236 - 173 (Roll no. 501). (text: CR H7116-7119)
lower
Dec 12, 2024
Introduced
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 7673 and S. 4199. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 7673 and S. 4199 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each bill and one motion to recommit on H.R. 7673 and one motion to commit on S. 4199. The resolution also provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to H.R. 5009 with one hour of general debate.
lower
Dec 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
Rule H. Res. 1612 passed House.
lower
Dec 10, 2024
Lower · Passed
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1612 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 7673 and S. 4199. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 7673 and S. 4199 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each bill and one motion to recommit on H.R. 7673 and one motion to commit on S. 4199. The resolution also provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to H.R. 5009 with one hour of general debate.
lower
Aug 1, 2024
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5750-5753; text: CR S5750-5752)
upper
Aug 1, 2024
Upper · Passed
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5750-5753; text: CR S5750-5752)
upper
Jun 18, 2024
Upper · Passed
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Coons for Senator Durbin with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
upper
Jun 13, 2024
Upper · Passed
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
upper
Apr 19, 2024
Committee
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
upper
Apr 19, 2024
Introduced
Introduced in Senate
upper
1 primary · 17 co-sponsors

Sponsors