Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments
The provided bill text fragment is incomplete and does not describe the full scope of SB 226. The excerpt mentions a peace officer's reporting requirement regarding driver license hearings, but this does not align with the bill's title ("Fatal Motor Vehicle Accident Amendments") or clarify how it addresses fatal accidents. Without additional text detailing the bill's provisions, affected parties, or mechanisms, a factual summary cannot be created. More context from the complete bill is required to fulfill this request.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Feb 2, 2026
Signed Mar 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
Substitute #1
→
Substitute #2
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates Utah's implied consent laws regarding chemical tests for drivers involved in accidents. The main change is a shift in the legal standard for testing: officers now need 'reasonable suspicion' rather than 'grounds to believe' to order a test. Additionally, the penalty for refusing a test was reduced from a three-year to a two-year driving prohibition without an ignition interlock device. The final requirement for fatal accidents was also modified to require officers to confirm no impairment is suspected before declining a warrant.
Scope change
The bill applies to all drivers involved in accidents where an officer has reasonable suspicion of impairment, and specifically modifies the protocol for officers investigating fatal accidents.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the legal standard for ordering a chemical test from 'grounds to believe' to 'reasonable suspicion' that the driver was operating a vehicle in violation of alcohol or drug laws.
Reduced the penalty for refusing a chemical test from a three-year prohibition to a two-year prohibition of driving without an ignition interlock device.
ENFORCEMENT
Updated the requirement for fatal accident investigations to state that officers must review facts with a senior officer to 'confirm that no impairment is suspected' before declining to seek a warrant.
TECHNICAL
Corrected a typo in the penalty description, changing 'five or 10 yearfive-year' to 'five-year or 10-year'.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 23, 2026 · House Mar 6, 2026
How they voted
22–1
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 29
Feb 23, 2026
D
Democratic6
100% Yea
N
Forward1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
68% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
66
Key actions
12
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Mar 23, 2026
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
upper
Mar 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
upper
Mar 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ concurs with House amendment
lower
Mar 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
upper
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Committee
House/ to standing committee [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ floor amendment
upper
Feb 23, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-1-6)
senate
Feb 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ comm rpt/ amended [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Introduced
Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee]
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 226
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 226. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline