Child Welfare Modifications
This bill modifies Utah's child welfare laws by clarifying the differences between protective custody warrants and child safety warrants issued by juvenile courts. It authorizes juvenile courts to issue child safety warrants to protect a child's health, safety, or welfare, while explicitly stating that such warrants do not grant peace officers or caseworkers the authority to take a child into protective custody. The legislation also allows those executing either type of warrant to request assistance from others and updates various definitions related to abuse, children, and juvenile court procedures. These changes aim to provide clearer legal guidelines for law enforcement and child welfare workers when responding to situations involving children.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Failed
Mar 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Last action Mar 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
Amended Excerpts 2/26/2026 19:02:747
→
Amended Excerpts 2/2/2026 11:02:818
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended from House to Senate version, shifting the amendment date from February 26 to February 2 and changing the committee attribution from House to Senate. The substantive text changes show a reorganization of warrant execution procedures, moving from a single continuous section to a split structure with new subsections for shelter placement requirements.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding child welfare warrant execution was modified to add specific shelter facility requirements when executing protective custody warrants, changing how children are processed after warrant execution.
REQUIREMENT
Added specific requirement that peace officers or caseworkers executing protective custody warrants must take children to a shelter facility or detention center rather than allowing alternative placement options.
ENFORCEMENT
Restructured warrant execution procedures from a single paragraph into multiple subsections, separating protective custody warrant execution from investigative warrant procedures.
TECHNICAL
Removed House-specific amendment markings and replaced with Senate Committee Amendment designations, indicating the bill moved from House to Senate jurisdiction.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 18, 2026 · House Mar 5, 2026
How they voted
23–4
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 29
Feb 18, 2026
D
Democratic6
100% Yea
N
Forward1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
46
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Mar 5, 2026
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (30-43-2)
house
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ amended [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ amended [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Introduced
House Comm - Amendment Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Committee
House/ to standing committee [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ comm rpt/ amended [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 30, 2026
Introduced
Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 21, 2026
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 124
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 124. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline