Criminal Protective Order Amendments
SB 123 requires courts issuing pretrial protective orders in domestic violence cases to include specific provisions protecting victims' utility services at their residence. The bill mandates that orders either prohibit the alleged perpetrator from terminating utilities for 60 days or require them to restore services if already cut off. This directly affects domestic violence victims and their residences by preventing utility disruption as a form of coercion. The law makes technical updates to Utah Code Section 78B-7-803 without changing who pays utility costs, focusing solely on ensuring service continuity during protective orders.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Feb 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Signed Mar 26, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Substitute #1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to add a new House Sponsor and an effective date. The core policy regarding utility protections for victims in pretrial protective orders was significantly expanded by adding three new subsections that clarify the court's authority to assign costs, require payment for restoration, and explicitly state that these orders do not determine financial responsibility for utility bills.
Scope change
The bill's scope of policy impact remains focused on criminal protective orders, but the specific requirements for handling utility services were broadened to include cost allocation and restoration mandates.
TECHNICAL
Added a new House Sponsor (Grant Amjad Miller) to the bill header.
TIMELINE
Added Section 2 establishing the bill's effective date as May 7, 2025.
REQUIREMENT
Added new provisions allowing courts to specify who pays for utility services and requiring alleged perpetrators to pay for restoring utilities if ordered.
DEFINITION
Added a clarification stating that protective order provisions regarding utilities do not constitute a determination of financial responsibility for the bills.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Mar 26, 2025
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Feb 26, 2025
Legislature · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
legislature
Feb 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
House/ committee report favorable
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Committee
House/ to standing committee
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Jan 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate/ committee report favorable
upper
Jan 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
upper
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee
upper
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Stephanie Pitcher
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 123
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 123. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline