HR 573 United States House · 119th Congress

Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act

HR 573, the "Studying NEPA’s Impact on Projects Act," requires the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to annually publish detailed reports starting July 2025 on how the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) affects federal projects. The reports will track NEPA-related lawsuits (including outcomes and costs), the length and cost of environmental reviews (like impact statements), and timelines for completing key review steps over 5- to 10-year periods. Data must be broken down by project type (e.g., energy, transportation) and sector (e.g., renewable energy, pipelines) to show trends in compliance, delays, and expenses. This information will be made publicly available online and submitted to relevant congressional committees, providing transparency on NEPA’s practical implementation without changing the law itself.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Dec 2025
House Passage
Dec 2025
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Jan 21, 2025 Last action Dec 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in House Engrossed in House · 10 edits · Dec 9, 2025
MAJOR
The Engrossed version of HR 573 restructures the NEPA reporting system so that lead agencies submit data to CEQ rather than CEQ compiling it directly, shifts the first reporting deadline from July 2025 to July 2026, narrows the scope from tracking both environmental impact statements and environmental assessments to only EISs, and refines legal terminology around litigation outcomes. It also adds a requirement to disaggregate data before and after the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 and changes the Senate receiving committee from Energy and Natural Resources to Environment and Public Works.
SCOPE

The reporting scope was narrowed from covering both environmental impact statements (EIS) and environmental assessments (EA) to covering only EISs. Environmental assessments are no longer tracked for page counts, costs, or timelines.

The Senate committee receiving reports changed from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

The authority to designate additional covered sectors was expanded from CEQ alone to 'the Council on Environmental Quality or lead agency,' giving individual agencies some say in defining new sectors.

REQUIREMENT

The reporting structure changed from CEQ directly compiling and publishing a single report to a two-step process where each lead agency head first submits its own report to CEQ, which then publishes them and forwards them to Congress. The first deadline moved from July 1, 2025 to July 1, 2026.

Litigation outcome categories were refined: 'reversed' became 'held unlawful and set aside under 5 U.S.C. 706(2)'; 'allowed to move forward' became 'decision allowing the Federal agency to proceed'; 'directed to take additional measures' became 'remanded for reconsideration without vacating the analysis'; and settlement language now specifies 'settlement agreement or consent decree.' A new provision allows agencies to report award information in a subsequent report if it arrives after the filing deadline.

New requirement to disaggregate EIS length data before and after the enactment of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 for reports through 2028, and to disaggregate timeline data before and after that Act for reports through 2033.

Cost reporting changed from 'total cost' to 'an estimate of the cost,' and a new cost category was added for project sponsors that prepared an EIS under the supervision of the lead agency.

DEFINITION

The term 'cause of action based on alleged non-compliance with this Act' was replaced with 'civil action alleging an agency action in violation of this Act,' narrowing the scope to civil actions specifically and clarifying that the claim is about a specific agency action rather than general non-compliance.

TECHNICAL

Page count methodology changed: citations and appendices are now excluded from the main EIS page count and reported separately, rather than being included in the total. The term 'published in the Federal Register' was replaced with 'made publicly available' in multiple places, broadening what counts as a public milestone.

The timeline tracking consolidated separate draft and final EIS publication milestones into a single milestone for when 'the environmental impact statement was made publicly available.' The disaggregation by covered sector is now required only 'to the extent practicable' rather than unconditionally.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Dec 10, 2025
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
upper
Dec 9, 2025
Introduced
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5086-5087)
lower
Dec 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5086-5087)
lower
Dec 9, 2025
Introduced
Mr. Crank moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
lower
Dec 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-393.
lower
Nov 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Hearings Held
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors

Sponsors