HR 2709 United States House · 119th Congress

Save Our Sequoias Act

Summary
Save Our Sequoias Act This bill provides for the conservation of giant sequoia trees ( Sequoiadendron giganteum ) in California. Specifically, it provides statutory authority for the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition and outlines the coalition's duties. The coalition must submit a Giant Sequoia Health and Resiliency Assessment and annually update it. The information from the assessment must be made available so the information can be integrated into certain other plans. The coalition must also create and maintain a website that contains the assessment, educational materials, searchable information about individual giant sequoia groves, and a searchable database to track the status and costs of reforestation and rehabilitation activities. In addition, the bill declares an emergency on certain public lands and allows officials to carry out protection plans during the emergency to respond to the threat of wildfires, insects, and drought. The emergency expires after seven years. The Department of the Interior must develop and implement a Giant Sequoia Reforestation and Rehabilitation Strategy. Finally, the bill establishes a variety of programs and funds to support the conservation of giant sequoias.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Apr 8, 2025 Last action Mar 17, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in House Engrossed in House · 14 edits · Mar 16, 2026
MAJOR
The Engrossed version of HR 2709 makes substantial changes to the Save Our Sequoias Act, most notably removing the authorization of appropriations (approximately $245 million over seven years), removing the good neighbor authority amendments and the Wilderness Act amendment, and adding a new section on insect monitoring. The bill also streamlines environmental review requirements for Protection Projects, adds public transparency provisions, and broadens the scope of the emergency protection fund to include BLM lands and the Foundation for America's Public Lands.
FISCAL

The entire authorization of appropriations section was removed. This eliminated $10M for FY2026, $25M for FY2027, $30M each for FY2028-2030, and $40M each for FY2031-2032 (roughly $245M total), along with a 90% minimum allocation requirement for Protection Projects and collaborative restoration grants.

The Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Fund was expanded to include the Foundation for America's Public Lands as a partner alongside the National Park Foundation and National Forest Foundation. The fund's scope was also broadened from 'National Park Service and covered National Forest System lands' to 'covered public lands and covered National Forest System lands,' which includes BLM-managed lands.

SCOPE

The entire section amending the good neighbor authority in the Agricultural Act of 2014 was removed. This had allowed national parks (Kings Canyon, Sequoia, Yosemite) to enter good neighbor agreements, permitted Indian tribes as parties, and established revenue-sharing rules for timber sales with a 2030 termination date.

The amendment to the Wilderness Act was removed. The introduced version had added language stating that nothing in the Wilderness Act precludes reforestation activities to reestablish giant sequoias following a wildfire.

The Assessment's land identification requirement in section 5(a)(1)(C) was expanded from simply 'lands located near giant sequoia groves at risk of high-severity wildfires' to include both lands contiguous or adjacent to groves at risk AND lands where fuel break placement could reduce wildfire risk to groves.

REQUIREMENT

A new section 10 on giant sequoia insect monitoring and technology was added, requiring the Secretary to develop an insect monitoring strategy within one year, seek public-private partnerships for monitoring technology, and submit a report to Congress within two years.

A new public notice requirement was added in section 6(c), requiring the Secretary to provide notice of each Protection Project on a publicly available website.

A new public meeting requirement was added in section 4(d), requiring the Coalition to hold at least one public meeting annually, with limited exceptions for closed sessions involving sensitive law enforcement matters or confidential commercial/property information.

The Assessment's policy recommendations were narrowed. The introduced version required recommendations on Federal and State policies that impede giant sequoia activities, new policies needed to increase treatment pace and scale, communication options, and research gaps. The engrossed version removed the first two categories, keeping only communication/collaboration options and research gaps.

ENFORCEMENT

The NEPA categorical exclusion for Protection Projects was significantly simplified. The introduced version required projects to be proposed by the Assessment, developed through a collaborative process, or proposed by a resource advisory committee, and limited 2,000-acre projects to groves with a grove-specific plan or lands identified as high-risk. The engrossed version removes all of those conditions, requiring only that projects stay within acreage limits (2,000 acres in groves; 3,000 acres on adjacent lands) and occur on Federal land or non-Federal land with consent.

The provision allowing a responsible official to carry out Protection Projects before initiating NEPA analysis, Endangered Species Act consultation, and National Historic Preservation Act consultation was removed.

A new extraordinary circumstances provision was added requiring that the procedures under 7 CFR 1b.3(e) through (g) apply to categorically excluded Protection Projects and reforestation activities.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'collaborative process' was changed from a standalone definition describing a multi-stakeholder development process to a cross-reference to section 4003(b)(2) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009. The definition of 'grove-specific hazardous fuels reduction plan' was removed entirely.

The definition of 'reforestation' was restructured from a single sentence into three discrete methods: (A) natural regeneration; (B) natural regeneration with site preparation and vegetation competition control; or (C) planting or direct seeding.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2503-2507)
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2503-2507)
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
lower
Mar 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee on Agriculture discharged.
lower
Mar 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-542, Part I.
lower
Mar 5, 2026
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
lower
Mar 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Apr 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Committee
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 29 co-sponsors

Sponsors