PROTECT Our Kids Act
HR 1069, the PROTECT Our Kids Act, prohibits federal funding for elementary and secondary schools that partner with Chinese government-funded programs like Confucius Institutes or Confucius Classrooms. The bill bans funds under applicable federal education programs from schools having such partnerships, effective one year after enactment. Schools with existing contracts before the bill's passage may request waivers by proving the partnership benefits students and supports U.S. security, though waivers expire when contracts end. The law directly affects schools receiving federal education funds and requires schools to comply within 90 days of enactment.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Dec 2025
House Passage
Dec 2025
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Feb 6, 2025
Last action Dec 4, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced in House
→
Engrossed in House
·
3 edits
·
Dec 4, 2025
MINOR
The engrossed version of HR 1069 makes primarily technical and formatting changes from the introduced version. The most notable structural change is moving the definitions from subsection (e) of section 2 into a new standalone section 3, and broadening the definitional scope from 'this section' to 'this Act.' All other changes are typographical, including smart apostrophes and capitalization corrections.
TECHNICAL
Definitions were moved from subsection (e) of section 2 into a new standalone section 3 titled 'Definitions,' changing the introductory language from 'In this section' to 'In this Act.' This is a structural reorganization that technically broadens where the definitions apply, though in practice the effect is minimal since the Act contains only two substantive sections.
Straight apostrophes were replaced with typographic (curly) apostrophes in references to 'People's Republic of China' in subsections 2(a)(1) and 2(a)(2).
The label 'ESEA Terms' was changed to 'Esea terms,' a minor capitalization correction.
Floor votes · House Dec 4, 2025
How they voted
247–164
Passed · 22 other
Total votes 433
Dec 4, 2025
D
Democratic213
76% Nay
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican219
97% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Dec 4, 2025
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
upper
Dec 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 164 (Roll no. 313). (text: CR H5032)
lower
Dec 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 247 - 164 (Roll no. 313). (text: CR H5032)
lower
Dec 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 916 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965 and H.R. 4305. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4312, H.R. 1005, H.R. 1049, H.R. 1069, H.R. 2965, and H.R. 4305 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-14.
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 13.
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin Hern
RRepublican
Co
Andy Barr
RRepublican
Co
Kevin Kiley
IIndependent
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HR 1069
Scope: US
Hi! I can help you understand HR 1069. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline