To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 relating to the review of the interagency dispute resolution process.
HR 6602 amends the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to require U.S. agencies to resolve disputes involving countries under a comprehensive U.S. arms embargo. It specifically adds these countries to the scope of interagency export control disputes and mandates that such disputes "shall be decided" (replacing the previous "may be decided"). This change ensures timely resolution of export-related conflicts for nations subject to full U.S. arms embargoes. The bill directly affects federal agencies managing export controls and the countries covered by the embargo.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2023
Committee Review
Mar 2024
House Passage
Mar 2024
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Dec 5, 2023
Last action Mar 20, 2024
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced in House
→
Engrossed in House
·
3 edits
·
Mar 19, 2024
MINOR
The Engrossed version of HR 6602 adds two substantive provisions to the interagency dispute resolution process under the Export Control Reform Act: a formal definition of 'countries subject to a comprehensive United States arms embargo' (the State Department's arms embargo list plus Russia explicitly), and a tie-breaking authority for the committee chair when the committee cannot reach a majority vote. The existing change from 'may be decided' to 'shall be decided' is retained but renumbered.
Scope change
The scope of the dispute resolution provision is clarified by defining which countries qualify as subject to a comprehensive arms embargo, and the decision-making mechanism is strengthened by adding a chair tie-breaker to prevent deadlocks.
DEFINITION
Adds a formal definition of 'country subject to a comprehensive United States arms embargo' as any country listed in 22 CFR 126.1(d)(1) (the State Department's arms embargo list, frozen at the day before enactment) plus the Russian Federation explicitly.
ENFORCEMENT
Grants the committee chair authority to decide any case or matter where the committee is unable to reach a decision by majority vote, effectively giving the chair tie-breaking power.
REQUIREMENT
Changes 'may be decided' to 'shall be decided,' making the dispute resolution process mandatory rather than permissive (this change was present in both versions but renumbered from item 2 to item 3).
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Amendments
3
Mar 20, 2024
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
upper
Mar 19, 2024
Introduced
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1203)
lower
Mar 19, 2024
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1203)
lower
Mar 19, 2024
Introduced
Mr. McCormick moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
lower
Dec 13, 2023
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
lower
Dec 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Dec 5, 2023
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
lower
Dec 5, 2023
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard McCormick
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HR 6602
Scope: US
Hi! I can help you understand HR 6602. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline