Home Texas Elections 2026 Brandon Gill

Brandon Gill

Republican candidate · 2026 general election · Texas

Photo of Brandon Gill

Brandon Gill

Republican

Currently serving in the U.S. House District 26.

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Jun 30, 2026. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Every stored cycle for Brandon Gill is on their legislator profile →

The 2026 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$4,217,213
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$3,384,259
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$376,086
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$2,933,524
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$1,411,512
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $4,217,213 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2026 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$3,384,25980.2%
PAC and other committee contributions$376,0868.9%
Party committee contributions$2,8040.1%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$454,06410.8%
Total receipts$4,217,213100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jun 30, 2026 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2026 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$1,411,512
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$46,734
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$9,000
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$398,589
Transfers made to other authorized committees$6,740
Repayments of candidate loans$505,000
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$3,754,149Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans-$505,000Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$9,000Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00857359, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what Q1 2026 reported and what Q2 2026 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. Q1 2026 reported through Mar 31, 2026 and Q2 2026 through Jun 30, 2026.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00857359
MeasureQ1 2026Reported through Mar 31, 2026Q2 2026Reported through Jun 30, 2026Change
Cash on hand at period end$1,010,914$1,411,512Up $400,599
Debts owed by the committee$60,882$46,734Down $14,148
Contribution refunds in the period$0$5,000Up $5,000

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $1,411,512 set beside the $717,439 this campaign spent during Q2 2026, through Jun 30, 2026, which is 2.0 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Brandon Gill. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $2,408,784 of itemized spending across 3,102 transactions, through Jun 30, 2026. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 82.1% of the $2,933,524 in total disbursements reported for the 2026 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

The difference between that subtotal and total disbursements is spending reported without itemization, which cannot be categorized.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Fundraising and solicitation $1,615,16267.1%2,541
Consulting, type not specified $251,33910.4%29
Administration, salary, and overhead $157,4846.5%442
Advertising and media $139,3635.8%6
Legal, accounting, and compliance $122,4305.1%21
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $81,9623.4%33
Travel $17,3080.7%22
Polling and research $14,9380.6%1
Events $6,3120.3%2
Campaign materials $1,7370.1%3
Technology and digital services $7500.0%2
Classified$2,326,82396.6%
Unclassified filing descriptions$81,9623.4%
Itemized spending categorized here$2,408,784100%3,102

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 122 shown $391,050 total · $50,000 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00284885$10,0002.6%2Feb 4, 2026
2SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. PAC C00411116$10,0002.6%2Feb 24, 2026
3MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC C00428052$10,0002.6%2Feb 10, 2026
4THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00467431$10,0002.6%2Jun 3, 2025
5U.S. ANESTHESIA PARTNERS, INC. PAC D/B/A/ USAP PAC C00574103$10,0002.6%2Jul 16, 2025
Show the complete list of 122 committees →

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Conduits

A conduit forwards contributions that individuals earmarked for a named candidate. The amounts below come from the receiving campaign's conduit memo records and remain part of its reported individual-contribution total; they are not added to receipts again. MyRepTracker groups only memos carrying a registered conduit committee's FEC ID and does not decode or store contributor names, addresses, employers, occupations, or memo text. The record count is a count of FEC memo records, not donors.

Conduit records shown through Jun 30, 2026 · fetched Sep 8, 2026.

1 organization shown $5,479 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Registered conduits ranked by individuals' earmarked contributions routed through them
RankCommitteeAmountShareFEC memo recordsLast activity
1WINRED C00694323$5,479100.0%20Mar 3, 2026

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2026 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Brandon Gill

Committees itemized $391,050 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $104,00026.6%2230
Corporate PACs $83,00021.2%2943
Trade association PACs $72,00018.4%3042
Non-connected committees $49,50012.7%1317
Membership organization PACs $36,0509.2%1216
Other candidates' committees $29,0007.4%1015
Cooperative PACs $9,5002.4%35
Labor union PACs $8,0002.0%35
Itemized total for this direction$391,050

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Brandon Gill

Committees itemized $391,050 in contributions to this campaign. $133,000 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $258,050, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $179,300 and committees not yet categorized account for $78,750.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Agribusiness Agriculture $28,80011.2%1017
Construction Construction $20,5007.9%47
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $20,0007.8%44
Technology Communications and technology $18,0007.0%36
Food and beverage Agriculture $15,0005.8%69
Physicians and medical specialties Health $14,5005.6%34
Automotive Transportation $9,5003.7%27
Air transport Transportation $6,0002.3%13
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $6,0002.3%23
Oil and gas Energy and natural resources $6,0002.3%34
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue $6,0002.3%22
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $5,0001.9%11
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $3,5001.4%22
Public sector unions Labor $3,5001.4%23
Trucking Transportation $3,5001.4%33
Accounting Professional services $2,5001.0%11
Pharmaceuticals Health $2,0000.8%11
Telecommunications Communications and technology $2,0000.8%12
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $1,0000.4%11
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $1,0000.4%11
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $1,0000.4%11
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $1,0000.4%11
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $1,0000.4%11
Mining Energy and natural resources $1,0000.4%11
Transportation unions Labor $1,0000.4%11
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $133,000Not applicable3245
Committees not yet categorized $78,75030.5%3242
Base the shares are taken over$258,050100%
Itemized total for this direction$391,050

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$55,500
Across 9 notices, received Feb 12, 2026 to Feb 27, 2026

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Mar 1, 2026. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Brandon Gill's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2026 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Mar 1, 2026$33,0007Feb 27 to Feb 27, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 27, 2026$5,0003Feb 25 to Feb 25, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 26, 2026$1,0001Feb 24 to Feb 24, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 25, 2026$1,0001Feb 23 to Feb 23, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 22, 2026$5,0001Feb 20 to Feb 20, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 21, 2026$1,0001Feb 19 to Feb 19, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 20, 2026$4,5004Feb 18 to Feb 18, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 19, 2026$1,0001Feb 17 to Feb 17, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Feb 14, 2026$4,0001Feb 12 to Feb 12, 2026Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $1,466,514 of the $3,782,848 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 53,157 itemized contributions.

From Texas

$522,603
35.6% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$943,911
64.4% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Texas is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2026 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$1,466,51453,157100.0%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 51 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Texas this campaign's state $522,603
  • California $144,856
  • Florida $139,156
  • Virginia $51,912
  • New York $43,565
  • Ohio $39,786
  • Georgia $39,044
  • Tennessee $31,344
  • Arizona $30,503
  • Pennsylvania $28,192
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2026 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Texas this campaign's state$522,60310,64635.6%
California$144,8565,3649.9%
Florida$139,1565,9439.5%
Virginia$51,9121,7173.5%
New York$43,5651,1853.0%
Ohio$39,7861,6172.7%
Georgia$39,0442,5122.7%
Tennessee$31,3441,4222.1%
Arizona$30,5031,1002.1%
Pennsylvania$28,1921,5991.9%
North Carolina$26,1751,3791.8%
Illinois$24,7731,4451.7%
South Carolina$19,6341,0401.3%
Colorado$19,3788581.3%
Washington$18,5101,1651.3%
New Jersey$18,0648191.2%
Michigan$17,8881,0121.2%
Kansas$16,9395881.2%
Louisiana$13,6468710.9%
Oklahoma$13,0715230.9%
Utah$12,5218530.9%
Mississippi$12,5028620.9%
Indiana$11,9876670.8%
Nevada$11,9125600.8%
Wisconsin$11,6386730.8%
Maryland$11,2536300.8%
Alabama$11,0376050.8%
Minnesota$10,9475500.7%
Missouri$10,7225700.7%
Oregon$9,2654070.6%
Wyoming$9,2491410.6%
District of Columbia$8,976350.6%
Arkansas$7,7614420.5%
Massachusetts$7,1222480.5%
Kentucky$6,1854190.4%
Connecticut$5,7932570.4%
Idaho$5,7643940.4%
Montana$5,7434340.4%
Maine$5,3031710.4%
Iowa$4,7602470.3%
North Dakota$4,1651010.3%
Nebraska$3,5611760.2%
New Mexico$3,2721600.2%
West Virginia$3,2361500.2%
Hawaii$3,1932730.2%
South Dakota$2,7451500.2%
Delaware$2,735480.2%
Alaska$1,596890.1%
New Hampshire$1,198140.1%
Rhode Island$859210.1%
Vermont$4755<0.1%
Reported with a place$1,466,51453,157100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle: 259 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $4,217,213
  • Cohort median $89,281
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$4,217,213
Lowest in the cohort-$26
25th percentile$13,215
Median$89,281
75th percentile$514,776
Highest in the cohort$8,056,948
Campaigns counted259

254 of the 259 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 98th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 8.9%
  • Cohort median 0.0%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign8.9%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median0.0%
75th percentile6.0%
Highest in the cohort85.8%
Campaigns counted240

190 of the 240 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 79th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $1,411,512
  • Cohort median $2,086
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,411,512
Lowest in the cohort-$44,709
25th percentile$0
Median$2,086
75th percentile$68,408
Highest in the cohort$6,389,992
Campaigns counted259

247 of the 259 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 95th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$7,061,640
Campaigns counted259

0 of the 259 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Texas, 2026 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$1,842,767
Campaigns counted259

0 of the 259 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.