Relating to the reimbursement of expenses to certain counsel appointed to represent a defendant in a criminal proceeding.
HB 3449 amends Texas law to require reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred by appointed defense attorneys in noncapital criminal cases (excluding public defender office staff). It covers costs like investigations, expert fees, and travel/lodging for attorneys traveling over 50 miles to meet defendants confidentially, plus remote communication costs. Expenses approved by the court will follow capital case reimbursement rules (Articles 26.052(f)-(g)), while unapproved expenses use capital case rules under Article 26.052(h). The bill takes effect September 1, 2025, applying only to expenses incurred after that date.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 21, 2025
Last action May 15, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Engrossed
·
5 edits
·
May 14, 2025
MODERATE
This bill updates reimbursement rules for appointed criminal defense counsel in Texas, clarifying how expenses are paid based on whether court approval was obtained in advance. The changes standardize payment procedures for both pre-approved and post-approval expenses, ensuring consistent treatment across different case types.
Scope change
The bill applies to noncapital criminal cases where counsel is appointed by the state, excluding public defender office attorneys.
FISCAL
Added new subsection (d-1) establishing specific reimbursement procedures for expenses incurred with and without prior court approval
Reorganized expense categories to clearly distinguish between investigation costs, expert witness fees, and travel/lodging expenses for defendants in remote facilities
REQUIREMENT
Clarified that travel expenses include food and lodging when defendants are housed more than 50 miles from the court
Included remote communication costs as reimbursable expenses for confidential communications with defendants
TECHNICAL
Removed formatting artifacts and standardized bill text structure from introduced to engrossed version
Floor votes · House May 14, 2025
How they voted
137–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 142
May 14, 2025
D
Democratic58
98% Yea
R
Republican84
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
7
May 15, 2025
Committee
Referred to Criminal Justice
upper
May 15, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
upper
May 14, 2025
Introduced
Received from the House
upper
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed
lower
May 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed to engrossment
lower
May 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report sent to Calendars
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report distributed
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Left pending in committee
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
lower
Mar 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
lower
Mar 21, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Terry Canales
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 3449
Scope: TX
Hi! I can help you understand HB 3449. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline