Home Tennessee Elections 2026 U.S. House District 5

U.S. House District 5

2026 general election · 1 open.

Incumbents

No incumbent is running.

Challengers

Campaign finance

Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.

Every candidate below reports through Jul 17, 2026.

Reported campaign finance for each candidate with complete FEC data in the 2026 cycle
CandidateTotal receiptsCash on handDirect PAC receipts
Charles W. Hatcher Republican$719,503$104,821$3,500
Charles M. Molder Democratic$2,599,775$1,482,196$215,700

Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Jul 17, 2026.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

Highest total receipts: Charles M. Molder at $2,599,775. Lowest: Charles W. Hatcher at $719,503. The largest reported value sets this scale at $2,599,775.

Cash on hand

The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.

Highest cash on hand: Charles M. Molder at $1,482,196. Lowest: Charles W. Hatcher at $104,821. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,482,196.

Direct PAC receipts

Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

Highest direct PAC receipts: Charles M. Molder at $215,700. Lowest: Charles W. Hatcher at $3,500. The largest reported value sets this scale at $215,700.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.

Highest outside spending supporting: Charles M. Molder at $33,707. Lowest: Charles W. Hatcher at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $33,707.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

Highest outside spending opposing: Charles W. Hatcher at $273,014. Lowest: Charles M. Molder at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $273,014.

Where each campaign's committee money came from

Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.

Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Leadership PACs$0$87,50045.5%
Non-connected committees$0$37,33819.4%
Labor union PACs$0$32,50016.9%
Other candidates' committees$0$24,50012.7%
Membership organization PACs$0$8,6004.5%
Party committees$0$2,0001.0%
Itemized total$0$192,438

Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Building trades unions Labor$0$15,00019.1%
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue$0$10,00012.7%
Transportation unions Labor$0$7,5009.6%
Industrial unions Labor$0$5,0006.4%
Lawyers and law firms Professional services$0$2,5003.2%
LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue$0$2,5003.2%
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees$0$114,000
Committees not yet categorized$0$35,93845.8%
Itemized total$0$192,438

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Non-connected committees$0$33,707100.0%
Itemized total$0$33,707

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Committees not yet categorized$0$33,707100.0%
Itemized total$0$33,707

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Non-connected committees$273,014100.0%$0
Itemized total$273,014$0

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCharles W. Hatcher RepublicanCharles M. Molder Democratic
Committees not yet categorized$273,014100.0%$0
Itemized total$273,014$0

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.

48-hour notices reported by candidates in this race
CandidateReported on noticesNoticesCoversState
Charles W. Hatcher Republican$55,6739Jul 18 to Aug 4, 2026$55,673 still provisional
Charles M. Molder Democratic$51,8297Jul 18 to Aug 3, 2026$51,829 still provisional

Candidates not compared

These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.

Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.