Diana Lynn Harshbarger
U.S. House District 1
2026 general election.
Incumbents
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jul 17, 2026.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican incumbent | $1,274,194 | $1,985,063 | $683,250 |
| Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke Democratic | $101,984 | $14,106 | $250 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Jul 17, 2026.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Diana Lynn Harshbarger at $1,274,194. Lowest: Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke at $101,984. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,274,194.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Diana Lynn Harshbarger at $1,985,063. Lowest: Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke at $14,106. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,985,063.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Diana Lynn Harshbarger at $683,250. Lowest: Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke at $250. The largest reported value sets this scale at $683,250.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: Diana Lynn Harshbarger at $13,375. Lowest: Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $13,375.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican | Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $322,50045.5% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $165,00023.3% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $105,50014.9% | $250100.0% |
| Non-connected committees | $67,7709.6% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $26,5003.7% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $10,0001.4% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $6,7501.0% | $0 |
| Corporations without capital stock | $5,5000.8% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $709,520 | $250 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican | Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $148,25022.0% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $73,50010.9% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $38,5005.7% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $34,5005.1% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $27,5004.1% | $0 |
| Health insurance Health | $23,5003.5% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $18,0002.7% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $17,0002.5% | $0 |
| Defense Defense | $16,0002.4% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $14,5002.2% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $14,0002.1% | $0 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $11,5001.7% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $11,5001.7% | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $11,0001.6% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $10,0001.5% | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $8,5001.3% | $0 |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $6,5001.0% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $6,0000.9% | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $5,0000.7% | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $3,5000.5% | $0 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $3,0000.4% | $0 |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $3,0000.4% | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $2,5000.4% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $2,0000.3% | $0 |
| Health care unions Labor | $1,5000.2% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $1,0000.1% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $161,27024.0% | $250100.0% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $36,500 | $0 |
| Itemized total | $709,520 | $250 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican | Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $13,375100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $13,375 | $0 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican | Kristi Amber Mickelle Burke Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Committees not yet categorized | $13,375100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $13,375 | $0 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Lynn Harshbarger Republican | $37,644 | 8 | Jul 21 to Aug 4, 2026 | $37,644 still provisional |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Richard G. Baker (Independent): No FEC data is stored for cycle 2026.
- Joshua Ray Ashburn (Independent): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
- Christopher T. Campbell (Independent): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
- William Eugene Cody (Independent): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
- Tyler Brice Mitchell McClain (Independent): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.