proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring a declaration of necessity and clarifying public use of private property taken or damaged by eminent domain.
This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would prohibit South Dakota governments from using eminent domain to transfer private property to private companies or non-governmental entities solely for economic development or increased tax revenue. It would require any property transfer to serve a clear public purpose, such as infrastructure or public services, rather than benefiting private interests. The amendment would apply to all state and local government actions involving property takings and must be approved by voters at the next general election. If adopted, it would change how governments can acquire property for development projects.
Bill status
in committee
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Jan 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2026
Last action Mar 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
HJR5001C
→
HJR5001E
·
2 edits
MINOR
This bill amendment clarifies the definition of 'public use' in South Dakota's eminent domain provisions, explicitly excluding increases in tax base, tax revenues, employment, or general economic health from qualifying as public use. The change strengthens protections against transferring private property to non-governmental entities for economic development purposes.
Scope change
The amendment expands the scope of protected property by adding specific exclusions to the definition of public use, making it harder for government entities to claim economic benefits as justification for eminent domain takings.
DEFINITION
Added explicit language clarifying that 'public use' does not include increases in tax base, tax revenues, employment, or general economic health, providing clearer boundaries for what constitutes valid public use under eminent domain.
REQUIREMENT
Modified the description of the amendment's purpose to include clarification of public use of private property taken or damaged by eminent domain, expanding the resolution's explanatory scope.
Floor votes · House Jan 27, 2026
How they voted
62–5
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 70
Jan 27, 2026
D
Democratic5
80% Nay
R
Republican65
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
4
Mar 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 14, NAYS 19 S.J. 433
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 3 S.J. 34
upper
Feb 25, 2026
Introduced
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 33 Amendment HJR5001E
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate State Affairs S.J. 131
upper
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 62, NAYS 5 H.J. 154
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Introduced
House of Representatives Motion to amend , Passed, YEAS 35, NAYS 32 H.J. 153 Amendment HJR5001C
lower
Jan 27, 2026
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (62-5-3)
house
Jan 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 3 H.J. 1
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 1 Amendment HJR5001B
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, H.J. 1 Amendment HJR5001A
lower
Jan 14, 2026
Introduced
First read in House and referred to House State Affairs H.J. 24
lower
29 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Al Novstrup
RRepublican
P
Bethany Soye
RRepublican
P
Carl Perry
RRepublican
P
Greg Blanc
RRepublican
P
Heather Baxter
RRepublican
P
John Sjaarda
RRepublican
P
Jon Hansen
RRepublican
P
Kaley Nolz
RRepublican
P
Karla Lems
RRepublican
P
Kathy Rice
RRepublican
P
Kevin Jensen
RRepublican
P
Lana Greenfield
RRepublican
P
Lauren Nelson
RRepublican
P
Les Heinemann
RRepublican
P
Liz May
RRepublican
P
Logan Manhart
RRepublican
P
Mark Lapka
RRepublican
P
Marty Overweg
RRepublican
P
MyKala Voita
RRepublican
P
Peri Pourier
RRepublican
P
Scott Moore
RRepublican
P
Spencer Gosch
RRepublican
P
Sue Peterson
RRepublican
P
Taffy Howard
RRepublican
P
Tamara Grove
RRepublican
P
Tesa Schwans
RRepublican
P
Tim Goodwin
RRepublican
P
Tom Pischke
RRepublican
P
Tony Kayser
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HJR 5001
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand HJR 5001. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline