HB 1176 South Dakota House · 2026 Regular Session

clarify bond or pre-trial release upon sobriety program participation.

HB 1176 clarifies that South Dakota courts may require defendants to participate in a 24/7 sobriety program as a condition of bond or pre-trial release. It prevents defendants from being jailed or having their release revoked solely due to inability to pay program costs, unless a court finds they could pay but willfully avoided doing so. Defendants must prove they didn’t willfully skip payments or made a genuine effort to pay. Unpaid program costs may later be added to a defendant’s sentence if the court determines they have the ability to pay. The bill directly affects individuals in criminal cases offered this program.
Bill status passed both 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Failed
Mar 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2026 Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced Senate Appropriations Engrossed · 3 edits · Mar 5, 2026
MINOR
This bill establishes a state fund to cover the costs of the 24/7 sobriety program and clarifies that defendants cannot be jailed or have their bonds revoked solely for failing to pay program fees. It requires courts to find that a defendant has the ability to pay before imposing unpaid costs on them after a case is concluded.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope by creating a dedicated state treasury fund to reimburse counties and cover program expenses, shifting the financial burden from local jurisdictions to the state.
FISCAL

Created a new state treasury fund called the '24/7 sobriety fund' to be administered by the Attorney General for program costs and county reimbursements.

ENFORCEMENT

Clarified that defendants cannot be jailed or have bonds revoked for non-payment unless the court determines they have the ability to pay.

REQUIREMENT

Added a requirement that unpaid program costs can only be imposed after a case disposition if the court finds the defendant has the ability to pay.

Floor votes · Senate Mar 9, 2026

How they voted

826
Failed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Mar 9, 2026
D Democratic3
3 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican32
5 Yea 26 Nay 1
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 26 S.J. 491
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on Appropriations Report out of committee without recommendation as amended , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 4 S.J. 10
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on Appropriations Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 5 S.J. 10
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Introduced
Committee on Appropriations Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 10 Amendment 1176B
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to , Passed, Senate Committee on Appropriations YEAS 6, NAYS 1 S.J. 35
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 248
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 0 H.J. 279
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, H.J. 19
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0 H.J. 19
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Introduced
First read in House and referred to House Judiciary H.J. 164
lower
5 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors