require closure of litigation over the recreational use of nonmeandered waters.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Feb 2022
Senate Failed
Feb 2022
Governor
Introduced Jan 27, 2022
Last action Feb 22, 2022
Floor votes · Senate Feb 22, 2022
How they voted
2–30
Failed
Total votes 32
Feb 22, 2022
D
Democratic3
100% Nay
R
Republican29
93% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
1
Feb 22, 2022
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (2-30)
senate
Feb 17, 2022
Upper · Passed
Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 293
upper
Feb 16, 2022
Upper · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 0
upper
Jan 27, 2022
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to S.J. 130
upper
5 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ernie Otten
RRepublican
P
Herman Otten
RRepublican
P
Hugh Bartels
RRepublican
P
Tim Goodwin
RRepublican
P
Tom Pischke
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 126
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 126. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline