Small Wireless Facilities Deployment Act
Summary
AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING ARTICLE 5 TO CHAPTER 11, TITLE 58 SO AS TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT ACT"; TO MAKE LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS; TO DEFINE RELEVANT TERMS; TO MAKE PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AGREEMENTS OR ENACTMENTS ADDRESSING THE DEPLOYMENT OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ENTERED INTO PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ACT; TO PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES TO UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGARDING ENACTMENTS ADDRESSING DECORATIVE POLES, UNDERGROUND DISTRICTS, DESIGN DISTRICTS, AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS; TO AFFIRM THE POWERS OF UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH RESPECT TO WIRELESS FACILITIES THAT ARE NOT SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN RIGHTS OF WAY; TO PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES TO WIRELESS PROVIDERS AND UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH CONTROL OVER RIGHTS OF WAY REGARDING THE COLLOCATION OF CERTAIN SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES WITHIN RIGHTS OF WAY; TO MAKE PROVISIONS FOR APPLICATIONS, FEES, APPLICATION REVIEW, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR THE COLLOCATION OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES; TO REQUIRE THAT APPLICATIONS TO COLLOCATE SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE MUST BE PROCESSED ON A NONDISCRIMINATORY BASIS; TO ENUMERATE THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT MAY DENY AN APPLICANT'S PROPOSED COLLOCATION OF A SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY, AND TO PROVIDE THAT SUBJECT TO THE ABILITY OF A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO DENY AN APPLICATION, THE COLLOCATION OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES MUST BE ALLOWED ON NONDISCRIMINATORY TERMS AND CONDITIONS; TO PROVIDE THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT HAS CONTESTED CASE JURISDICTION TO DETERMINE ALL DISPUTES ARISING UNDER THIS ACT; AND TO PROHIBIT A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FROM REQUIRING A WIRELESS PROVIDER TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE AUTHORITY AND ITS OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS AGAINST ANY CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, JUDGMENTS, COSTS, LIENS, LOSSES, EXPENSES, OR FEES, EXCEPT WHEN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION HAS FOUND THAT THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE WIRELESS PROVIDER WHILE INSTALLING, REPAIRING, OR MAINTAINING FACILITIES, POLES, OR SUPPORT STRUCTURES PURSUANT TO THIS ACT CAUSED THE HARM THAT CREATED SUCH CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, JUDGMENTS, COSTS, LIENS, LOSSES, EXPENSES, OR FEES. - ratified title
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2020
House Passage
Sep 2020
Senate Passage
Sep 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Mar 19, 2019
Signed Sep 29, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Sep 23, 2020 · House Apr 3, 2019
How they voted
27–6
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 39
Sep 23, 2020
D
Democratic14
78% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican24
62% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2020
Signed into law
Signed By Governor
legislature
Sep 24, 2020
Lower · Passed
Concurred in Senate amendment and enrolled
lower
Sep 24, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and returned to House with amendments
upper
Sep 23, 2020
Upper · Passed
Amended
upper
Sep 23, 2020
Upper · Passed
Recalled from Committee on Judiciary
upper
Sep 23, 2020
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-6-6)
senate
Jan 28, 2020
Committee
Referred to Subcommittee: Gambrell (ch), Hutto, Goldfinch, Sabb, Climer
upper
Apr 10, 2019
Committee
Referred to Subcommittee: Gambrell (ch), Hutto, Massey, Sabb, Climer
upper
Apr 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
upper
Apr 4, 2019
Introduced
Introduced and read first time
upper
Apr 4, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and sent to Senate
lower
Apr 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
Amended
lower
Apr 3, 2019
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (92-2-9)
house
Mar 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
Committee report: Favorable with amendment Labor, Commerce and Industry
lower
Mar 19, 2019
Committee
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
lower
Mar 19, 2019
Introduced
Introduced and read first time
lower
12 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Sandifer
RRepublican
P
Carl Anderson
DDemocratic
P
David Weeks
DDemocratic
P
Garry R. Smith
RRepublican
P
J. Gary Simrill
RRepublican
P
Jay West
RRepublican
P
Joseph Jefferson
DDemocratic
P
P. Michael "Mike" Forrester
RRepublican
P
Robert Williams
DDemocratic
P
Shedron D. Williams
DDemocratic
P
Todd Rutherford
DDemocratic
P
Wendell Gilliard
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about H 4262
Scope: SC
Hi! I can help you understand H 4262. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline