SB 2290 North Dakota Senate · 69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26)

AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 32-03.2-01 and 32-03.2-11 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to when a court or jury may give exemplary damages.

SB 2290 amends North Dakota law governing punitive damages (also called "exemplary damages"). It clarifies that courts or juries may only award these punitive damages when a defendant's conduct involves "oppression, fraud, or actual malice," proven by clear and convincing evidence. The bill sets strict procedural rules: a party must first file a motion with supporting evidence to seek punitive damages, and the award cannot exceed twice the compensatory damages or $250,000. It also prohibits punitive damages against manufacturers who complied with federal safety standards and adds specific rules for drunk driving cases involving recent DUI convictions. This law directly affects plaintiffs seeking punitive damages, defendants, and courts handling such claims in North Dakota.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Jan 20, 2025 Signed Mar 26, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

INTRODUCED Enrollment · 6 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates North Dakota's rules for when courts or juries can award punitive damages (exemplary damages). It clarifies definitions of fault and malice, establishes a two-step process for claiming punitive damages, sets a cap on the amount that can be awarded, and adds specific factors courts must consider when deciding on punitive damages.
Scope change
The bill applies to all tort actions in North Dakota where a defendant has been found guilty of oppression, fraud, or actual malice, and it modifies how these damages are calculated and awarded.
DEFINITION

Updated definitions of 'fault' and 'malice' to clarify what conduct qualifies for punitive damages consideration.

REQUIREMENT

Added a requirement that plaintiffs must file a motion with supporting affidavits or deposition testimony to claim exemplary damages after the initial lawsuit is filed.

Established a two-step trial process where compensatory damages must be determined before addressing exemplary damages.

Added specific factors courts must consider when awarding exemplary damages, including the relationship between damages and harm, reprehensibility of conduct, and defendant's awareness of wrongdoing.

Added protections preventing exemplary damages against manufacturers or sellers who complied with federal safety regulations, unless they knowingly misrepresented information or made illegal payments to secure approval.

ELIGIBILITY

Set a cap on exemplary damages at two times the compensatory damages or $250,000, whichever is greater, with exceptions for cases where no compensatory damages are awarded.

Floor votes · Senate Feb 5, 2025 · House Mar 18, 2025

How they voted

450
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 47
Feb 5, 2025
D Democratic5
5 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican42
40 Yea 2
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Mar 27, 2025
Introduced
Filed with Secretary Of State 03/26
legislature
Mar 26, 2025
Signed into law
Signed by Governor 03/25
upper
Mar 18, 2025
Lower · Passed
Second reading, passed, yeas 88 nays 5
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 12 1 1
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Hearing 09:00
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Introduced
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
lower
Feb 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Second reading, passed, yeas 45 nays 0
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 7 0 0
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Committee Hearing 10:30
upper
Jan 20, 2025
Introduced
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors