A 1502 New Jersey General Assembly · 2026-2027 Regular Session

"Patient and Provider Protection Act."

This bill regulates pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and insurance carriers to increase transparency and fairness in prescription drug coverage. It requires carriers and PBMs to establish pharmacy and therapeutics committees with strict conflict-of-interest rules, prohibits commission-based PBM compensation (mandating flat fees instead), and mandates detailed reporting of PBM fees for insurance filings. The law directly affects insurers, PBMs, and pharmacies by changing how drug formularies (approved drug lists) are managed and how PBM costs are calculated and disclosed. Key provisions include banning preferential formulary placement for higher-cost drugs over lower-cost generics/biosimilars and requiring actuarial documentation for PBM compensation. The bill aims to reduce patient cost-sharing and ensure PBM compensation aligns with administrative costs.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
General Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026 Last action May 18, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

Introduced Assembly Committee Substitute · 14 edits
MAJOR
The Assembly Committee Substitute for A1502 substantially expands the bill's scope and strengthens its regulatory requirements on pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs). It adds a lengthy legislative findings section citing federal PBM reform legislation (the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026), FTC reports, and academic research; redefines PBM compensation as a flat 'fee' capped at the value of services actually performed; extends key provisions to New Jersey's State Health Benefits Program and School Employees' Health Benefits Program; adds an annual compliance certification requirement signed by a PBM's CEO or CFO; and introduces new anti-steering and any-willing-pharmacy protections that apply to all PBM-pharmacy contracts, not just commercial market plans.
SCOPE

A new Section 1 with 17 subsections of legislative findings is added, citing the federal Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 (which established a 'bona fide service fee' model for Medicare), FTC interim reports on PBM market power and specialty generic drug markups, a 2024 House Oversight Committee report, and USC Schaeffer Center research estimating that delinking PBM compensation from list prices could save approximately $95.4 billion annually.

Multiple provisions are explicitly extended to apply to contracts between PBMs and the State Health Benefits Program and the School Employees' Health Benefits Program (new subsections in Sections 3, 4, and 5). A cross-reference is also added stating that for purposes of another pending bill, 'health benefits plan' includes Medicaid, the State Health Benefits Program, and the School Employees' Health Benefits Program.

The pharmacy reimbursement and anti-steering provisions (Section 7) are broadened from applying only to 'commercial market plan' contracts to all contracts between PBMs and contracted or network pharmacies, removing the commercial-market limitation.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'pharmacy benefits manager compensation' is replaced with 'pharmacy benefits manager fee,' now defined as a payment covering the cost of services actually performed and not exceeding their value, rather than the prior spread-pricing definition (the difference between what the carrier pays the PBM and what the PBM pays the pharmacy).

'Pharmacy benefits management services' is expanded from a brief three-item list to four detailed categories: negotiating drug prices and rebates, managing prescription drug benefits (claims processing, utilization review, prior authorization, appeals, network contracting, data management), performing administrative/clinical/pricing/financial/billing services, and any other services the department may define by rule.

The definition of 'commercial market plan' is removed entirely, which broadens the bill's applicability beyond just commercial plans to include public programs.

REQUIREMENT

The formulary tiering prohibition (Section 3, subsection c) is narrowed: it now only applies when a PBM's recommendation to place a higher-cost drug in a more favorable tier is 'based solely on the cost of the prescription drug and not on another factor,' rather than the prior blanket prohibition.

The flat-fee requirement (Section 4, subsection e) is rewritten: PBMs may only derive income from PBM fees set forth in the agreement, replacing the prior language about 'flat fee arrangement' and prohibition on 'commission structure.'

New Section 4, subsection f explicitly prohibits PBM fees from being directly or indirectly based on: (1) the acquisition cost or any price metric of a drug, (2) savings, rebates, or other fees collected by the PBM, or (3) premiums, deductibles, or cost sharing charged to patients.

The pharmacy reimbursement standard is simplified: instead of requiring both (1) at least the pharmacy's cost of acquisition AND (2) the NADAC benchmark, it now requires only the NADAC-based rate (plus Medicaid dispensing fee), with an explicit carve-out for pharmacies in which the PBM or its affiliate holds an ownership interest.

New Section 7, subsection d adds an 'any willing pharmacy' provision: a PBM cannot deny a pharmacy or pharmacist network participation if they agree to the established terms and conditions.

New Section 7, subsection e prohibits PBMs from (1) requiring covered persons to use a pharmacy in which the PBM or its affiliate has an ownership interest, or (2) offering or implementing plan designs that encourage use of such affiliated pharmacies.

ENFORCEMENT

New Section 4, subsection i requires each PBM authorized in New Jersey to certify annually by December 31st, signed by its CEO or CFO, that it has fully and completely complied with the compensation requirements during the prior calendar year.

ELIGIBILITY

The fiduciary duty provision (Section 5) is expanded to require PBMs to also act in the best interests of the State Health Benefits Program and School Employees' Health Benefits Program, while adding a clarification that no private cause of action is created for individual subscribers or enrollees.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the General Assembly by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
5
Key actions
1
Committee
2
May 18, 2026
Committee
Received in the Senate, Referred to Senate Commerce Committee
upper
May 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed by the Assembly (59-18-0)
lower
Mar 19, 2026
Committee
Reported as an Assembly Committee Substitute and Referred to Assembly Appropriations Committee
lower
Jan 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced, Referred to Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
lower
7 primary · 12 co-sponsors

Sponsors