Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.
This bill (A386) allows parties involved in family court cases (like divorce or custody matters) to request a venue change if they publicly comment on a judicial nominee during Senate committee hearings. Specifically, if a party makes oral remarks about a Superior Court judge nominee’s qualifications before a Senate committee, they may file a motion to move their ongoing family case to a different judicial district (vicinage), provided the new venue avoids the district where the nominee would serve if confirmed. The court must consider whether the original venue would prevent a fair trial due to the party’s public remarks, applying the existing standard for venue changes. The bill applies only to family actions already filed and affects parties who directly engaged with the Senate’s judicial nomination review process.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2024
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 9, 2024
Last action Jan 9, 2024
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
1
Key actions
0
Committee
0
Jan 9, 2024
Introduced
Introduced in the Assembly, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Auth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about A 386
Scope: NJ
Hi! I can help you understand A 386. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline