Home Nevada Elections 2022 U.S. Senate District at-large

U.S. Senate District (at-large)

2022 general election. Election concluded.

Archive: This page reflects certified results from the 2022 general election (certified January 31, 2023).

Campaign finance

Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.

Every candidate below reports through Dec 31, 2022, except where a row says otherwise.

Reported campaign finance for each candidate with complete FEC data in the 2022 cycle
CandidateTotal receiptsCash on handDirect PAC receipts
Catherine Cortez Masto Democratic$60,613,861$3,001,182$3,053,934
Adam Laxalt Republican$19,108,847$504,757$690,557
Barry Lindemann NPY FEC data through Nov 30, 2022$0$0$0

Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Each candidate's own coverage end date is in the table above.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

Highest total receipts: Catherine Cortez Masto at $60,613,861. Lowest: Barry Lindemann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $60,613,861.

Cash on hand

The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.

Highest cash on hand: Catherine Cortez Masto at $3,001,182. Lowest: Barry Lindemann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $3,001,182.

Direct PAC receipts

Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

Highest direct PAC receipts: Catherine Cortez Masto at $3,053,934. Lowest: Barry Lindemann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $3,053,934.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.

Highest outside spending supporting: Catherine Cortez Masto at $19,515,907. Lowest: Barry Lindemann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $19,515,907.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

Highest outside spending opposing: Catherine Cortez Masto at $50,745,983. Lowest: Barry Lindemann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $50,745,983.

Where each campaign's committee money came from

Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.

Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Corporate PACs$1,164,35336.4%$139,50018.1%
Leadership PACs$455,80014.2%$275,40035.7%
Non-connected committees$458,47714.3%$125,05016.2%
Trade association PACs$431,50013.5%$95,72412.4%
Labor union PACs$303,5009.5%$0
Membership organization PACs$233,6477.3%$50,6006.6%
Other candidates' committees$43,0431.3%$72,1009.4%
Party committees$65,7002.1%$10,5001.4%
Corporations without capital stock$25,5000.8%$2,0000.3%
Cooperative PACs$21,0000.7%$0
Itemized total$3,202,520$770,874

Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced

Contributions each campaign received for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Pharmaceuticals Health$161,5006.1%$5,0001.2%
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate$124,0004.7%$10,0002.4%
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate$108,5004.1%$10,0002.4%
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate$98,5003.7%$0
Food and beverage Agriculture$73,4102.8%$16,0003.9%
Physicians and medical specialties Health$82,0003.1%$5,0001.2%
Public sector unions Labor$87,0003.3%$0
Industrial unions Labor$75,5002.9%$0
Mining Energy and natural resources$63,0002.4%$11,5002.8%
Media and entertainment Communications and technology$71,0002.7%$2,5000.6%
Health insurance Health$73,0002.8%$0
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate$59,5002.3%$7,0001.7%
Technology Communications and technology$63,0002.4%$0
Transportation unions Labor$61,5002.3%$0
Construction Construction$31,0001.2%$26,0006.3%
Defense Defense$50,0001.9%$6,0001.5%
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources$46,0001.7%$10,0002.4%
Building trades unions Labor$55,0002.1%$0
Air transport Transportation$50,0001.9%$0
Oil and gas Energy and natural resources$6,0000.2%$42,00010.2%
Telecommunications Communications and technology$40,0001.5%$0
Agribusiness Agriculture$29,5001.1%$10,0002.4%
Automotive Transportation$33,0001.3%$4,4951.1%
Hospitals and nursing homes Health$35,8001.4%$0
Renewable energy Energy and natural resources$26,0001.0%$0
Lawyers and law firms Professional services$22,5000.9%$0
Trucking Transportation$15,0000.6%$7,5001.8%
Accounting Professional services$18,5000.7%$0
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue$0$15,0003.6%
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate$14,0000.5%$0
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue$10,0000.4%$0
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue$9,9000.4%$0
Nurses and nursing specialties Health$5,0000.2%$0
Gun control Ideological and single-issue$2,5000.1%$0
Committees not yet categorized$936,86735.5%$224,87954.5%
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees$564,543$358,000
Itemized total$3,202,520$770,874

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Non-connected committees$18,903,10896.9%$6,021,79599.3%
Labor union PACs$533,0072.7%$0
Membership organization PACs$79,7930.4%$44,8630.7%
Itemized total$19,515,907$6,066,658

Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending supporting each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue$10,461,00353.6%$0
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue$0$4,183,24869.0%
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue$3,018,45015.5%$0
Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue$1,716,7748.8%$0
Education policy Ideological and single-issue$0$622,56410.3%
Industrial unions Labor$547,6032.8%$0
Public sector unions Labor$336,5131.7%$0
Renewable energy Energy and natural resources$209,1131.1%$0
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate$79,7930.4%$0
Abortion rights Ideological and single-issue$0$31,7950.5%
Gun control Ideological and single-issue$5,7540.0%$0
Veterans Ideological and single-issue$3,3330.0%$0
Committees not yet categorized$3,137,57216.1%$1,229,05120.3%
Itemized total$19,515,907$6,066,658

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs the giving committee
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Non-connected committees$47,040,70392.7%$35,706,50073.3%
Party committees$0$12,371,71425.4%
Other candidates' committees$3,705,2307.3%$0
Labor union PACs$0$666,6931.4%
Membership organization PACs$500.0%$0
Itemized total$50,745,983$48,744,908

Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced

Independent spending opposing each candidate for each compared candidate, grouped by the interest the giving committee is categorized as advancing
CategoryCatherine Cortez Masto DemocraticAdam Laxalt Republican
Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue$41,379,44388.0%$0
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue$0$24,042,42066.1%
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue$0$7,878,34421.7%
Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue$0$1,932,4755.3%
Gun control Ideological and single-issue$0$850,0002.3%
Public sector unions Labor$0$666,6931.8%
Abortion rights Ideological and single-issue$342,8960.7%$0
Industrial unions Labor$0$9,0730.0%
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees$3,705,230$12,371,714
Committees not yet categorized$5,318,41411.3%$994,1882.7%
Itemized total$50,745,983$48,744,908

These candidates are compared in the table above but have no stored breakdown of where their committee money came from, so they are named here rather than shown as a column of zeroes.

  • Barry Lindemann: no breakdown is stored for this record yet

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.

48-hour notices reported by candidates in this race
CandidateReported on noticesNoticesCoversState
Catherine Cortez Masto Democratic$1,619,04825May 26 to Nov 4, 2022$126,503 still provisional
Adam Laxalt Republican$1,154,03315May 26 to Nov 4, 2022Covered by regular reports

Candidates not compared

These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.

  • Neil Scott (Libertarian): No FEC data is stored for cycle 2022.
  • Barry Rubinson (Independent American): No FEC data is stored for cycle 2022.

Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.