SB 346 Nevada Senate · 2025 Regular Session

Makes various changes relating to guardianship. (BDR 13-217)

SB 346 updates Nevada's guardianship laws to better support adults with disabilities by strengthening the use of supported decision-making agreements (SDMAs). It defines SDMAs for legal purposes, expands the definition of "incapacitated" to include people unable to understand SDMAs, and requires courts to consider SDMAs before appointing guardians. The bill mandates that guardianship petitions include proof of SDMA education for the proposed protected person and that physicians assess whether someone understands SDMAs. It also requires guardian reports to explain why SDMAs aren't used and allows guardianship termination if a protected person enters an SDMA.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Mar 13, 2025 Signed Jun 5, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

Reprint 2 As Enrolled · 6 edits · Jun 5, 2025
MODERATE
This bill transitions from a draft proposal to an enacted law, officially adding new requirements to Nevada's guardianship system. The changes mandate that courts and physicians explicitly consider 'less restrictive alternatives' (like powers of attorney) before appointing a guardian. Additionally, the law now requires that individuals seeking to transfer a guardianship order from another state must prove these alternatives were considered.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from a proposed amendment to a finalized statute, making the new requirements legally binding effective immediately upon enrollment.
REQUIREMENT

Added a mandatory requirement for physicians assessing guardianship needs to determine if less restrictive alternatives are available and sufficient.

Added a requirement for guardianship petitions to include an attestation that the proposed protected person was informed about less restrictive alternatives.

Added a requirement for guardian reports to explain why less restrictive alternatives are not being used.

Added new criteria for transferring out-of-state guardianship orders, requiring proof that less restrictive alternatives were considered.

DEFINITION

Added a new definition for 'less restrictive alternatives to guardianship' including durable powers of attorney and supported decision-making agreements.

ENFORCEMENT

Added the right for protected persons to be educated about less restrictive alternatives as part of their legal rights.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 22, 2025 · Assembly May 22, 2025

How they voted

200
Passed
Total votes 20
Apr 22, 2025
D Democratic12
12 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican8
8 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
7
Committee
3
Jun 5, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
executive
May 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Assembly Amendment No. 654 concurred in. To enrollment.
upper
May 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. In Senate.
upper
May 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 654.) To printer.
upper
Apr 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To printer.
upper
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 144.) Reprinting dispensed with.
upper
Mar 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
From printer. To committee.
upper
3 primary · 6 co-sponsors

Sponsors