Revise penalties for violations under 310 permit process
SB 472 removes the previous $250,000 cap on civil penalties for repeated violations of Montana's stream protection rules (under the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act). It specifically exempts forest activities that follow state forestry rules from these penalties. The bill affects developers, loggers, or others working in stream zones who violate permit requirements, allowing penalties to grow without limit for ongoing violations. It takes immediate effect upon approval.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Vetoed
Jun 2025
Introduced Feb 25, 2025
Vetoed Jun 12, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 11 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0472_X(2).pdf
→
SB0472_X(3).pdf
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill amends Montana's forest practices law to create an exception for allowable forest practices in stream management zones and modifies civil penalty procedures. The changes clarify that certain forest activities are exempt from penalties when conducted in designated stream areas and establish a streamlined process for collecting restoration costs under $15,000.
Scope change
The bill expands protections for forest practitioners by exempting allowable practices in stream management zones from civil penalties, while maintaining enforcement authority for restoration costs exceeding the threshold.
ELIGIBILITY
Creates an exception allowing forest practices in stream management zones when those practices are permitted under Title 77, Chapter 5, Part 3 of the Montana Code Annotated.
ENFORCEMENT
Establishes a streamlined civil collection process for restoration liabilities up to $15,000 through conservation district or county attorney actions, with larger amounts requiring district court proceedings.
TIMELINE
Changes the effective date provision from general passage and approval to an immediate effective date upon enactment.
DEFINITION
Amends Section 3-10-601 to incorporate the new exception for allowable forest practices in stream management zones.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2025 · House Apr 30, 2025
How they voted
42–8
Passed
Total votes 50
Apr 30, 2025
D
Democratic18
88% Yea
R
Republican32
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
55
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Jun 12, 2025
Vetoed
(S) Veto Override
upper
May 23, 2025
Vetoed
(S) Veto Override Vote in Progress
upper
May 12, 2025
Vetoed
(S) Vetoed by Governor
upper
May 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 30, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (42-8)
senate
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Free Conference Committee Appointed
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Hearing - Free Conference Committee on SB 472
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Free Conference Committee Appointed
upper
Apr 12, 2025
Introduced
(H) Returned to Senate with Amendments
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Natural Resources
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Natural Resources
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Natural Resources
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Natural Resources
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Natural Resources
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Natural Resources
upper
Feb 25, 2025
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Denley Loge
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 472
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 472. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline