Generally revise attorney fee awards
SB 39 revises the process for awarding attorney fees in civil lawsuits, especially those challenging a state statute or administrative rule. It requires that all attorney fee awards must be reasonable and sets specific requirements for how attorneys must document their work and expenses when requesting fees. The bill also establishes a rebuttable presumption that certain practices, like sending multiple attorneys to a deposition or charging for basic office costs, are unreasonable. Additionally, when attorney fees are awarded against the state, courts must consider the hourly rate charged by the state's attorney.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Dec 12, 2024
Signed May 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0039_X(3).pdf
→
SB0039_X(4).pdf
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill text was revised to remove the word 'ALL' from the description of attorney fee awards, changing the requirement from 'all certain awards' to 'certain awards.' This likely narrows the scope of the bill's application to only specific types of cases rather than all cases challenging state statutes or administrative rules. The changes appear to be primarily formatting and text refinement rather than substantive policy shifts.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by removing 'ALL' from the description of attorney fee awards, suggesting the law now applies only to certain specified cases rather than all cases challenging state statutes or administrative rules.
SCOPE
Removed the word 'ALL' from the bill title and summary, changing the requirement from 'all certain awards' to 'certain awards,' which may limit the bill's application to specific cases rather than all cases challenging state statutes or administrative rules.
TECHNICAL
Minor formatting changes including reorganization of line breaks and spacing throughout the document, with no substantive policy impact.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 15, 2025 · House Apr 11, 2025
How they voted
31–19
Passed
Total votes 50
Apr 15, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Nay
R
Republican32
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
48
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 9, 2025
Signed into law
(S) Signed by Governor
upper
May 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 15, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-19)
senate
Apr 12, 2025
Introduced
(H) Returned to Senate with Amendments
lower
Apr 11, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (60-39-1)
house
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 31, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 7, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Dec 12, 2024
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Greg Hertz
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 39
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 39. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline