Creating the private property protection act
SB 146, the "Private Property Protection Act," would have limited Montana government actions restricting private property use to only those demonstrably necessary for public health or safety. It would allow property owners to challenge restrictions (like zoning rules or fees) in court if they fail to meet strict standards, requiring governments to prove the restriction is the least restrictive option for a compelling public interest. The bill directly affects private property owners and local/state governments by creating a legal process for contesting regulations. However, it died in the legislative process in May 2025 and never became law.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2025
Last action May 23, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0146_2(3).pdf
→
SB0146_2(4).pdf
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill adds a specific exemption for restrictive covenants required by a government entity, clarifies that tribal government actions are covered, and strengthens enforcement by requiring plaintiffs to win unless the government proves the restriction is necessary for public health or safety. It also updates the statute of limitations to five years and clarifies severability rules.
Scope change
The bill's scope now explicitly includes restrictive covenants mandated by government entities and actions by tribal governments, which were previously ambiguous or excluded.
ELIGIBILITY
Added an exemption for restrictive covenants that were required by a governmental entity, meaning these cannot be challenged under the new law.
SCOPE
Explicitly included actions by tribal governments as covered under the bill's protections.
ENFORCEMENT
Changed the burden of proof so that a plaintiff must win the case unless the government proves the restriction is necessary for public health/safety and is the least restrictive option.
TIMELINE
Set the statute of limitations for filing a challenge at five years from when the person becomes aware of the issue.
TECHNICAL
Updated codification instructions to reflect that the new sections will be part of a new chapter in Title 76.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 13, 2025
How they voted
29–21
Passed
Total votes 50
Feb 13, 2025
D
Democratic18
94% Yea
R
Republican32
62% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Feb 13, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-21)
senate
Feb 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 16, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 14, 2025
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Becky Beard
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 146
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 146. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline